🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

No joke — you should give “Large Language Scholarship” a read. My co-author, Alan Rozenshtein, and I welcome your feedback on what we think are some foundational questions about the future of legal scholarship. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

I foolishly thought AI was going to let me work less, but in classic Jevons paradox fashion, I think I'm working even more now because I can accomplish so much more.

This article discusses the impact of #artificialintelligence on legal scholarship, introducing the concept of "Large Language Scholarship" & argues that #AI's integration into legal #academia will change both the quantity & quality of #scholarship. Read: spkl.io/6016fvUJM

.Alan Rozenshtein writes that the Trump administration and its lawyers' own conduct in courtrooms is making it impossible for courts to trust that the government is operating honestly and causing the relationship between the judicial and executive branches to break down.

Before you get bombarded with grading obligations and before you're too far along in your August paper... check out how gen AI can (and already is) transforming legal scholarship. Alan Rozenshtein & I explore just that and offer up some useful suggestions. Give it a read!

Today marks the 100th day of President Trump’s second term, one defined thus far by a flurry of executive orders and policies from dismantling federal agencies to the removal of immigrants to El Salvador. Below is a thread of some of our coverage of the Trump admin’s actions and

I'm open to the argument that the AI Diffusion rule wasn't the best way to compete with China, but it's a little weird, given everything else that's happening, to emphasize the danger of—checks notes—overreach of trade authorities and, my favorite, "Alienation of U.S. Allies."

In which we analyze the constitutionality of mollusk-based threats against Dear Leader.

I just posted Ipse Dixit, A Podcast on Legal Scholarship #817, featuring Kevin Frazier of UTexasLaw & Alan Rozenshtein of University of Minnesota Law School discussing their draft article "Large Language Scholarship: Generative AI in the Legal Academy." shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/epi…

The malpractice suits for *not* using AI are going to be extremely interesting.

Should judges use LLMs like ChatGPT to determine the meaning of legal text? Whatever your answer, it’s already happening… Peter Henderson, Kart Kandula, Faiz Surani, and I explain why this is a dangerous idea in a recent article for Lawfare... 🧵 (1/10)

If you haven't read "Large Language Scholarship," by Alan Rozenshtein and me...here's our thesis in a sentence courtesy of Joshua Gans: "I have produced several more papers (6 at journals & 2 already published) using an 'AI from the start' approach to research."

Incredible opportunity for the right person!

To humanities professors who hate AI: try investing 10 hours asking it a wide range of things that could be useful for you. I am 100% convinced it is worth your time, and I have used the tech for over a year. If you disagree, I respect that. Go ahead and keep hating on AI. But

The debate over law review submissions practices is only beginning. This may become a serious funding (and potentially also legal) vulnerability for law schools.

Agreed - very serious problems with untrained students acting as a) academic gatekeepers and b) intellectual representatives of the university Law reviews made sense maybe 60 years ago, before peer review become standard Now they’re completely bananas

Alan Rozenshtein an opportunity to revisit faculty governance of law reviews, at least in schools that give academic credit to editors

Jamal Greene Arun Rao This: “[I]t [sic] would be remiss if I did not mention the opportunity to elevate a female scholar from a non-T14 school earlier in her career," one of the memos said. Peer review editors play a lot of politics but I’ve never seen anything like that written in a referee report