Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian (@alemartnezr1) 's Twitter Profile
Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian

@alemartnezr1

Christian Jehovah's Witness
"He could not have been the Father previous to the Son. There was a time when neither sin existed, nor the Son" Tertullian

ID: 1183064449017626626

calendar_today12-10-2019 16:58:52

43,43K Tweet

4,4K Followers

3,3K Following

Theo_bviousšŸ““ (@christobvious) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Angels also have their own glory. Luke 9:26 ...when He shall come in His own ***glory*** and in His Father’s and ***of the holy angels***.

Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian (@alemartnezr1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Incoherence of the Philosophers, al-GhazālÄ« argued: ā€œIf the world has always existed, then an infinite number of actual temporal events must have passed. But an actual infinite cannot exist in reality — especially not one formed by successive addition.ā€ An actual infinite

Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian (@alemartnezr1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Argument from Time and Contingency 1. We notice around us things that come into being and go out of being. A tree, for example, grows from a tiny shoot, flowers brilliantly, then withers and dies. 2. Whatever comes into being or goes out of being does not have to be;

Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian (@alemartnezr1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Your argument hinges on the idea that if ( P ) is an actual infinite containing all past events, there shouldn’t be any past event outside it. If you can add enewe_{\text{new}}e_{\text{new}} , it means ( P ) lacked that event, undermining its claim to be a complete, actual

Certain Speaks (@certainspeaks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Every vision of Christ in the scriptures portrays him as separate and distinct from God... the God he continually worships: 1ļøāƒ£ Acts 7:55–56 — Stephen’s vision -Stephen sees Jesus standing at the right hand of God as two distinct beings. 2ļøāƒ£ Acts 9:3–6 — Saul’s (Paul’s) vision

Every vision of Christ in the scriptures portrays him as separate and distinct from God... the God he continually worships:

1ļøāƒ£ Acts 7:55–56 — Stephen’s vision

-Stephen sees Jesus standing at the right hand of God as two distinct beings.

2ļøāƒ£ Acts 9:3–6 — Saul’s (Paul’s) vision
Dr. Alaric NaudƩ (@goryodynasty) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The dative forms used here in Rev 5:13 τῷ καθημένῳ ("to the One sitting") and τῷ Ἀρνίῳ ("to the Lamb") which grammatically distinct and coordinate two concepts. The conjunction καί ("and") clearly separates two persons. The article τῷ is repeated, one for each noun

Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian (@alemartnezr1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Design Argument 1. Parts organized in a purposefully and orderdly manner are features produced by intelligence 2. The human body has its parts organized in a purposefully and orderdly manner 3. Therefore, the human body parts organized in a purposefully and orderdly manner are

Jacosta (@truechristian00) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🧵Scholars say Church Father, Justin Martyr, AGREES With Jehovah’s Witnesses View of the Logos (Jesus) 1. Robert M. Grant ā€œJustin makes the Logos a secondary deity, clearly subordinate.ā€ šŸ”¹ View: Real ontological hierarchy, not just functional. 2. Adolf von Harnack ā€œThe

Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian (@alemartnezr1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My view on God's attributes "understood" by AI: Not divine simplicity nor parts. Both extreme are avoided: You're drawing a key distinction between a part and a manifestation in the context of God's attributes. A part implies something separable, divisible, or independent, even

Jacosta (@truechristian00) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Khalil Andani, PhD Natural Theist - Tatian the Assyrian Not at all. That would only follow if these manifestations were externalized or distinct from God’s essence. But in this framework, they are neither separate nor dependent realities, they are God Himself revealing His indivisible essence in diverse ways, not entities alongside or

Jacosta (@truechristian00) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Prime Bible Welp, go ahead and prove it. I am waiting. And about John 1:1, lol that is FALSE Here’s proof šŸ‘‡šŸ½ Your own Trinitarian Scholars agree that the New World Translation and others of John 1:1 is accurate šŸ˜­šŸ„‚ These Trinitarian scholars honestly acknowledge that John 1:1c in