🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Occurred to me recently that while pre-AI cheating has always been easy for students who wanted to do it, there's never before been this much capital and mainstream credibility behind the idea that they *should* do it, and that it would be wrong for anyone to try and stop them

It's the 250th anniversary of the midnight ride of Paul Revere. I've mapped all seven Dunkin Donuts locations Paul could've stopped at on his route

AI is losing money day by day and its investors are desperate for you to buy into it. Dont fall for soppy propaganda from its main creators and investors. Just like crypto, its a grift

that em dashes are a dog whistle for ChatGPT use is devastating to me, who has been using em dashes constantly and probably incorrectly for years. First all the water and now em dashes.. what else will you lazy freaks take from me

we are jumping off the cliff into mass illiteracy and nobody with any power at any major university or secondary school system is willing to do anything about it

“Poems don't want to be understood. They'd rather be alive.” -- Niall O'Sullivan

this may be a hot take, but I do think one step in combatting AI is straight up eliminating grades. No matter what else you do or change, as long as we structure our education around getting grades, students are trained to see knowledge as a means to an end, not an end in itself.

has anyone stopped to ask WHY students cheat? would a buddhist monk "cheat" at meditation? would an artist "cheat" at painting? no. when process and outcomes are aligned, there's no incentive to cheat. so what's happening differently at colleges? the answer is in the article:

Hot take: Students using chatgpt to cheat are just following the system’s logic to its natural conclusion, a system that treats learning as a series of hoops to jump through, not a path to becoming more fully oneself.

AI (generative) is a greater threat to society than the current administration, but it's no coincidence that they operate hand in hand.

Hey Bill Melugin, just so you know, BY LAW members of Congress have an absolute right to conduct oversight at any ICE detention center, and cannot be denied entry.

In Fahrenheit 451, the abolition of reading began with tech companies simplifying books into summaries that you could read in five minutes. Because people no longer engaged with the texts, they forgot how to think. Then came the book-burnings.

Ray Bradbury; this is how you rebuild an attention span

just going to reiterate that as long as AI is devastating for the environment, which is true of all AI, and does something you would normally pay an artist to do, which it will be doing for this film and does in any instance it generates something, it is inherently unethical

Wow, what a stressful week of work. Time to relax by holding a phone beaming endless streams of horrific international news inches from my head

Keeps threatening me with a good time

What have I missed recently in HAD, I wondered? Anyway, I don't recommend reading this perfect square.

Live and uncut (idk, maybe a little cut)

chapbook sale! one for you, one for your love. one for your bag, one for your nightstand. one for each pocket. they’re small enough. use the code BOOKSALE in our store now to buy one & get one 50% off. press.elsewheremag.org

Stone Circle Replay Wednesday poem: "Concessions" by Ori Fienberg (Ori Fienberg) stonecirclereview.com/concessions/