James Burnham (@burnhamdc) 's Twitter Profile
James Burnham

@burnhamdc

"well-known conservative attorney" - NYT. Managing Partner at King Street Legal and President at Vallecito Capital. Former @WhiteHouse @TheJusticeDept @DOGE

ID: 1944046369980727296

linkhttps://www.kingstlegal.com/ calendar_today12-07-2025 14:49:21

289 Tweet

3,3K Followers

55 Following

James Burnham (@burnhamdc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I worked closely with Jeff Clark in both Trump Administrations. This is an outrageous weaponization of the bar ethics process--one that could be turned against any lawyer serving in government at any time. All steps must be taken to push back.

Douglass Mackey (@dougmackeycase) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Senator Eric Schmitt Thank you for your time, Senator. We are grateful for your fight against internet censorship and weaponization. We will fight with you side by side to make sure this never happens again. Love the Cardinals gear, too. Awesome stuff!

James Burnham (@burnhamdc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Very grateful to Senator Eric Schmitt for taking the time to meet with Douglass Mackey and me today to discuss our efforts to obtain Justice for Doug. Senator Schmitt is a great conservative leader and true champion for Doug and other regular people who have suffered severe abuse at

James Burnham (@burnhamdc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Friends, this is what winning looks like. Andrew Ferguson is putting serious points on the board everywhere--this time by taking concrete action to protect free speech for conservatives. Wins like this are how we stop the woke censorship regime from ever happening again.

Eric W. (@ewess92) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"[T]he Supreme Court’s stay in NTPSA I is also not binding because the Supreme Court granted a stay in NTPSA I on the Supreme Court’s shadow docket." Before this opinion issued, the Supreme Court explained that its emergency docket rulings are binding. Obvious, explicit error

"[T]he Supreme Court’s stay in
NTPSA I is also not binding because the Supreme Court granted a stay in NTPSA I on the Supreme 
Court’s shadow docket." Before this opinion issued, the Supreme Court explained that its emergency docket rulings are binding. Obvious, explicit error