
CEP
@cep_uk
The Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry aims to advance policy to support people harmed by psychiatric drugs, dependency & withdrawal. Secretariat to @appgpdd
ID: 2276587874
http://cepuk.org 04-01-2014 19:57:36
4,4K Tweet
7,7K Followers
411 Following


Awais Aftab The hubris of mainstream psychiatry is so much worse than anything on ICI’s website- these docs are telling people antidepressants are safe and effective for long term use- despite extremely shakey evidence , and don’t even tell people about pssd or the risk of protracted

I was one of the clinicians who looked over the ICI Inner Compass Initiative content, and I believe it is a valuable resource providing info' not easily accessible elsewhere. The basic problem is that it comes from a drug-centred perspective that establishment psychiatrists can't accept.


Dr Samei Huda, having already had his X account suspended twice for bullying & harrassment, has now, in a new incident, been sanctioned by the GMC for RTing threats of sexual violence towards a female professional. He continues to bring the profession into disrepute Royal College of Psychiatrists👇



"The people who are saying its "in your brain" are the people who are going to make it less likely that we are going to solve the problems that are making people unhappy, distressed and anxious in the first place." Bang on from Dr Joanna Moncrieff





This editorial in the Lancet about Dr Joanna Moncrieff's new book & work (an editorial still baised in favour of the drugs) is illustrative of what a central figure she has become in the history of modern psychiatry. Her work & influence can't be ignored.... thelancet.com/journals/lance…





Let's call it out for what it is. The drug company–funded Science Media Centre UK consistently promotes a pro-psychopharmaceutical agenda, often elevating 'expert' voices aligned with industry interests. It really is that straightforward. I just wish more in the media would realise this....



Sameer is throwing mud again. He calls our review 'poor' but Ghaemi's re-analysis 'elegant,' which shows this has nothing to do with science. Unlike ours, Ghaemi's had no protocol, outdated analysis and inconsistent results. Martin Plöderl Details here journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02…