Chantal D’Amore (@chantal_damore) 's Twitter Profile
Chantal D’Amore

@chantal_damore

Postdoc researcher in Social, Political and Moral psychology @univGroningen| Morality, polarization, Groningen gas extraction (chantaldamore.bsky.social)

ID: 1185889218037538816

calendar_today20-10-2019 12:03:29

63 Tweet

338 Followers

388 Following

Maaike Homan (@maaikehoman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This Friday (12/05) from 10:30-16:00 is the next Dutch Political Psychology Meeting. Everyone is welcome to join at the ASCoR | @[email protected] (Roeterseiland campus, C10.20). We have a great full program of speakers! See below 👇

Maaike Homan (@maaikehoman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

10:45 Daan Scheepers: "Social change as challenge and threat: A social psychophysiological approach" 11:25 Chantal D’Amore : "Perceived polarization amplifies attitude moralization in response to partisan news: A four-wave longitudinal study around the 2020 US election campaign"

Maaike Homan (@maaikehoman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

13:05 Leticia Micheli: "In pursuit of racial equality: identifying the determinants of support for the Black Lives Matter movement" 13:45 @GootjesFrank: "Societal discontent as a catalyst for action: how a negative sentiment about society at large fuels political action"

Maaike Homan (@maaikehoman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

14:40 Flavio Azevedo :"Measuring Ideology: Current practices, its consequences, and recommendations" 15:20 Kevin Koonings: "An era of conspiracies and the great reset of democracy"

Bert Bakker (@bnbakker) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It is time for another Dutch Political Psychology Meeting. We have a full, on site, program. For details about speakers and talks, see the tweets from Maaike Homan. If you are in the area, feel free to join. We meet from 10.30 - 16.00 ASCoR | @[email protected] REC C10.20.

Adrian Lüders (@adrian_lueders) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wonderfull kickoff for #easp2023krk at the Navigating Social Change pre conference! Thank to our brilliant speakers Paszkál Kiss , Melissa Jauch , @GonnekeT , Chantal D’Amore , Marty Colombo , Zachary Petzel , @LisetteYip , Elena Bacchini , @tobisachs

Wonderfull kickoff for  #easp2023krk at the Navigating Social Change pre conference! Thank to our brilliant speakers Paszkál Kiss , <a href="/Melissa_Jauch/">Melissa Jauch</a> , @GonnekeT , <a href="/Chantal_DAmore/">Chantal D’Amore</a> , Marty Colombo , Zachary Petzel , @LisetteYip , Elena Bacchini , @tobisachs
Charlie Crimston (@drcharlie_c) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Big thank you to Chantal D’Amore, Kelly Kirkland, and Jolanda for joining me for this #easp2023krk symposium on societal moralisation and division. Super interesting work and even better humans.

Big thank you to <a href="/Chantal_DAmore/">Chantal D’Amore</a>, <a href="/Kelly_Kirkland_/">Kelly Kirkland</a>, and <a href="/jetten_j/">Jolanda</a> for joining me for this #easp2023krk symposium on societal moralisation and division. Super interesting work and even better humans.
Chantal D’Amore (@chantal_damore) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"The Intergroup Value Protection Model: A Theoretically Integrative and Dynamic Approach to Intergroup Conflict Escalation in Democratic Societies". Very happy to see our paper online in PSPR! With Martijn van Zomeren, Eric Shuman Ana Leal Inga Lisa journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10…

"The Intergroup Value Protection Model: A Theoretically Integrative and Dynamic Approach to Intergroup Conflict Escalation in Democratic Societies". Very happy to see our paper online in PSPR! With Martijn van Zomeren, <a href="/EricMShuman/">Eric Shuman</a> <a href="/ALeal__/">Ana Leal</a> <a href="/inga_pauls/">Inga Lisa</a> journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10…
OOIR (@observeir) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Trending in #SocialPsychology: ooir.org/index.php?fiel… 1) Race, objectivity & hiring preferences 2) Happiness & narcissism 3) The Intergroup Value Protection Model 4) Independents, not partisans, are more likely to hold and express electoral preferences based in negativity

Trending in #SocialPsychology:
ooir.org/index.php?fiel…

1) Race, objectivity &amp; hiring preferences

2) Happiness &amp; narcissism

3) The Intergroup Value Protection Model

4) Independents, not partisans, are more likely to hold and express electoral preferences based in negativity
Cillian McHugh (@cillianmacaodh) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Next International Moral Psychology (IMP) Seminar Series talks: Monday, November 6th at 12pm EST Flashtalk from Chantal D’Amore Main talk from Paul Conway Registration: us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist… With Meltem Yucel (Melt-um You-Jell) and Jim AC Everett 🇬🇧🏳️‍🌈 Can't wait!!!

The Next International Moral Psychology (IMP) Seminar Series talks:
Monday, November 6th at 12pm EST

Flashtalk from <a href="/Chantal_DAmore/">Chantal D’Amore</a> 
Main talk from Paul Conway

Registration: us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…

With <a href="/DrMeltemYucel/">Meltem Yucel (Melt-um You-Jell)</a> and <a href="/JimACEverett/">Jim AC Everett 🇬🇧🏳️‍🌈</a>

Can't wait!!!
Emily Kubin (@emily_kubin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Check out Kurt Gray's awesome new interview about our ongoing research on our moral minds and the role of victimization and vulnerability in understanding polarization.

Marion Koopmans, publications: https://pure.eur.nl (@marionkoopmans) 's Twitter Profile Photo

COVID19 booster uptake along political demographic lines in The Netherlands, a study. Differences by age, political preference, country of origin, and less importantly, socio-economic status.

COVID19 booster uptake along political demographic lines in The Netherlands, a study. Differences by age, political preference, country of origin, and less importantly, socio-economic status.
Jay Van Bavel, PhD (@jayvanbavel) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Perceived polarization strengthens attitude moralization (and vice versa) This explains how non-moralized conflict about topics like climate change or Covid between groups can evolve into zero-sum conflict during periods of intense polarization.

Builders (@buildersmvt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"Much of the existing research has suggested that the moralization of political attitudes at a large scale can be dangerous for society and democracy. For example, moralization tends to make people more opposed against compromises, more hostile towards people with different