Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile
Cheryl Schatz 🩸

@cherylschatz

Follower of Christ, author, peacemaker, apologetics, Free video “The Giving Judas the Betrayer” here youtu.be/hWL7pCt_mWs

ID: 433780555

calendar_today11-12-2011 00:53:04

35,35K Tweet

3,3K Followers

3,3K Following

Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Here is another clue, the words that the author wrote as a quotation of Jesus are often read aloud at the beginning of the month when Christians are gathered together. Who is the one who quoted Jesus, and what words did he “add” that no one else quoted Jesus as saying?

Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The next clue should really help. The person who *apparently* added words to the quote from Jesus is Paul. Can you pick out the words he added—and what do you make of it?

Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So, a head-covering guy wants all Christian women veiled? Paul, you want to weigh in on that? Paul: 18 But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the

So, a head-covering guy wants all Christian women veiled?
Paul, you want to weigh in on that?

Paul:
18 But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the
Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This exchange is what led me to post a poll. Charles Daniel (Charles Daniel) accused me of being warped, sinful, self-condemned, and a divisive person—referencing Titus 3:10–11. In response, I told him I would put it to a public poll. ❌ Charles said it was my posture, not my

This exchange is what led me to post a poll. Charles Daniel (<a href="/charlesddaniel/">Charles Daniel</a>) accused me of being warped, sinful, self-condemned, and a divisive person—referencing Titus 3:10–11. In response, I told him I would put it to a public poll.

❌ Charles said it was my posture, not my
Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Paul about hair in 1 Corinthians 11. Since there is no punctuation in the Greek, This is a perfectly valid way to translated verses 14-16. Does this make sense to you? 1 Corinthians 11:14–16 (ISV) 14 Nature itself teaches you neither that it is disgraceful for a man to have long

Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It may appear that Eve and Paul added to the words of God (or Jesus), yet Scripture never rebukes or corrects them. Their testimonies remain uncontested—see Genesis 3:3 and 1 Corinthians 11:25. 1 Corinthians 11:25 (NASB95) 25 In the same way He took the cup also after supper,

It may appear that Eve and Paul added to the words of God (or Jesus), yet Scripture never rebukes or corrects them. Their testimonies remain uncontested—see Genesis 3:3 and 1 Corinthians 11:25.

1 Corinthians 11:25 (NASB95)
25 In the same way He took the cup also after supper,
Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Adam and Eve’s handmade garments were a response to sin and shame—their instinct to cover themselves after breaking trust with God. Likewise, when Christians today describe themselves as the “chief of sinners,” it raises a question: are they repeating Paul’s unique testimony as

Adam and Eve’s handmade garments were a response to sin and shame—their instinct to cover themselves after breaking trust with God.

Likewise, when Christians today describe themselves as the “chief of sinners,” it raises a question: are they repeating Paul’s unique testimony as
Cheryl Schatz 🩸 (@cherylschatz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

📖 Bible Quiz: 1 Corinthians 11:10 Let’s dig into a fascinating verse. Read it carefully, then consider these questions: 1. Why does Paul say “therefore”? What point is he building on? 2. What do you notice about the phrase “symbol of”? Is it actually in the original Greek?

📖 Bible Quiz: 1 Corinthians 11:10

Let’s dig into a fascinating verse. Read it carefully, then consider these questions:

1. Why does Paul say “therefore”? 
What point is he building on?

2. What do you notice about the phrase “symbol of”? 
Is it actually in the original Greek?