Current DEXs (just like CEXs) force you to trade against market makers who have superior information, can manipulate spreads, profit from your losses, and control order flow. Research from BIS and Wharton documented how Automated Market Makers extract value through slippage and

the Trading World is waking up

Here's the fast track to bring immense utility by scaling crypto on BSV rails: wrap $USDC / $USDT into a @STAStoken using an $ICP container. This creates a fully peer-to-peer, trustless bridge for tens of millions of stablecoin users to transact on BSV for fractions of a cent.

Every current DEX has a single legal entity that can be attacked, sued, or shut down. DXS suggests a solution to this through radical brand and entity distribution. Multiple independent entities operate CFD brokerages under their own brands and jurisdictions using the same

The DXS licensing model enables anyone to run a CFD brokerage using the open-source protocol while maintaining their own legal structure and brand identity. Unlike MetaTrader or cTraders where you pay hefty fees and still sell your customers to market makers, DXS provides both

When hundreds of legal entities operate in different jurisdictions using the same protocol, regulatory pressure in one location doesn't affect operations in others. This creates natural regulatory arbitrage that protects user access while encouraging regulatory competition.

Many DEXs host on IPFS claiming it provides regulatory protection because there's "no legal entity" to target. This is legally naive and strategically flawed. When regulators want to stop a platform, they suspend the domain names users actually use. Primary domain suspended.

The Core Misconception About Bitcoin: Most people think Bitcoin is about eliminating trust. It's not. Bitcoin is about disintermediating value transmission - removing middlemen from transfers, not removing trust entirely. The Confusion: Trust in issuers still matters and always

DXS isn't just building a better DEX. It's creating a template for rebuilding financial infrastructure without centralized extraction mechanisms. When DXS succeeds, existing DEXs will face pressure to eliminate their centralization mechanisms or lose users to genuinely

While platforms claim to be "decentralized," they typically have founding teams with significant token allocations, venture capital investors with governance rights, development companies controlling platform evolution, and fee structures benefiting specific parties. These

Tornado Cash demonstrated that technical decentralization provides no protection against coordinated regulatory action. Developers were arrested. Domains were seized. Smart contracts were sanctioned by OFAC. Users faced legal risks. The technical sophistication meant nothing

Not many pay attention. DXS has proposed something very unique and original. Wrap, bring the asset, if one is restricted the others continue. Same fault tolerance as a geo distribution of cloud resources but for finance. HUGE ♥️

How do you fund protocol development without centralized control? The DXS licensing model creates sustainable economics where multiple entities contribute through their own success. The founding entity operates its own CFD brokerage just like anyone else, with no special

DXS solves the cross-platform challenge by separating the user interface from protocol control. Multiple entities can build apps that connect to the same underlying protocol. This creates competition at the application layer while maintaining protocol-level decentralization. You

Thank you, Kurt, for taking the time to elaborate on your concerns about STAS Script. This is exactly the productive discussion we need. To be clear: we're not just advocating for STAS here, but for tokens with L1 settlement in general. This is a question of life and death for

The evidence is comprehensive and damning. Reports from BIS, Brookings, Wharton, and Springer all document the same patterns of centralization across supposedly decentralized platforms. Governance tokens concentrate power. Founder control persists through multiple mechanisms.

What is Orange Gateway?🟧 It’s the missing link, a shield for Bitcoin markets, a bridge between on-chain freedom and off-chain reality Built for builders. Powered by principles We hope our work inspires others to go further. The future of Bitcoin can’t be built alone🫡

You hold your own keys. You control your crypto. But what good is self-custody if the exchange you trade on is secretly centralized? If founders can change the protocol, if governance tokens can be accumulated to control decisions, if market makers can manipulate your trades,

You think you have a choice of DEXs, but look closer. They all use the same centralized models. Governance tokens creating oligarchies. Founder control through token allocations. Market maker extraction through AMMs. The names are different. The marketing varies. But the