David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile
David Sacks

@davidsacks

Tech founder & investor. Personal views only. Official account: @davidsacks47

ID: 1137701

linkhttp://sacks.substack.com calendar_today14-03-2007 04:14:58

13,13K Tweet

1,3M Followers

3,3K Following

Stephen Miller (@stephenm) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A lot of the fiscal discussion around the Big Beautiful Bill seems to conflate, whether willfully or not, the words “spending” versus the word “deficit.” There is no dispute that the bill cuts over $1.6 trillion in spending. It mainly accomplishes this through the largest

Vivek Ramaswamy (@vivekgramaswamy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We’ll make Ohio the most incorporation-friendly state for founders & innovators. Combine that with zero capital gains taxation & we’re paving the way for a new industrial boom. If Silicon Valley led our economy for the last decade, it’ll be the Ohio River Valley for the next one.

The AI Investor (@the_ai_investor) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The explosive growth of AI over the past two years is unlike anything we’ve seen before. It’s insane, AI is the biggest tech wave in history. $NVDA

The explosive growth of AI over the past two years is unlike anything we’ve seen before.

It’s insane, AI is the biggest tech wave in history.

$NVDA
David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Nobody was caught more off guard by the DeepSeek moment than the AI Doomers. They had been claiming: — that the U.S. was years ahead in AI; — that PRC leadership didn’t care much about AI; — that China would prioritize stability over disruption; and — that if the U.S. slowed

David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What does winning the AI race look like? It means we achieve a decisive advantage that can be measured in market share. If 80% of the world uses the American tech stack, that’s winning. If 80% uses Chinese tech, that’s losing. Diffusion is a good thing.

David Shapiro ⏩ (@daveshapi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I have been saying for 2+ years that the Doomers were uneducated on geopolitics, and that acceleration was the default path. One of the primary reasons I left AI safety was because none of the prime movers in the movement would even acknowledge this reality. Instead they kept

Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ending the World to Own Trump The people backing more war in Ukraine are deluded, treasonous, and insane. It's time to cut them all loose racket.news/p/ending-the-w…

Ending the World to Own Trump

The people backing more war in Ukraine are deluded, treasonous, and insane. It's time to cut them all loose 

racket.news/p/ending-the-w…
David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The future of AI has become a Rorschach test where everyone sees what they want. The Left envisions a post-economic order in which people stop working and instead receive government benefits. In other words, everyone on welfare. This is their fantasy; it’s not going to happen.

David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The main way to stop drones is to jam the signal from the operator. This creates a strong incentive for drone warfare to become autonomous as quickly as possible. (This is just an observation, not a policy recommendation.)

David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

While I agree with MTG on most issues (especially Ukraine), in this case I believe that a temporary moratorium on state AI regulation is the correct small government position. The alternative is a patchwork of 50 different regulatory regimes driven by the AI Doomerism that is

David Sacks (@davidsacks) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Very underrated problem. Two little-known proxy advisory firms (which effectively control shareholder voting) are responsible for driving crazy ESG and DEI requirements throughout corporate America.

Neil Chilson ⤴️⬆️🆙📈 🚀 (@neil_chilson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This new op ed by Dario Amodei opposing the moratorium doesn't make a ton of sense. It criticizes the gorwing state patchwork, calls for federal transparency regulation, and says state regulation should be focused on transparency, too. Yet he opposes a moratorium? A thread.

This new op ed by <a href="/DarioAmodei/">Dario Amodei</a> opposing the moratorium doesn't make a ton of sense. It criticizes the gorwing state patchwork, calls for federal transparency regulation, and says state regulation should be focused on transparency, too. Yet he opposes a moratorium?  A thread.
Neil Chilson ⤴️⬆️🆙📈 🚀 (@neil_chilson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The biggest problem, though: The op-ed frames state lawmakers as passing light-touch transparency requiresments. In reality, the leading state proposals (THERE ARE 1000+ bills!) are much more invasive than simple disclosure mandates - they include audit requirements, algorithmic