Dirk L. (@dirque_l) 's Twitter Profile
Dirk L.

@dirque_l

Does and teaches applied mathematics. (he/him, er/ihn)

ID: 780575699035840512

linkhttps://www.math.uni-bremen.de/zetem/DirkLorenz calendar_today27-09-2016 01:12:04

4,4K Tweet

1,1K Followers

359 Following

SIAM Activity Group on Dynamical Systems (@dynamicssiam) 's Twitter Profile Photo

RIP Peter Lax (1926–2025): nytimes.com/2025/05/16/sci… "Lax has made important contributions to integrable systems, fluid dynamics and shock waves, solitonic physics, hyperbolic conservation laws, and mathematical and scientific computing, among other fields." (h/t Carina Curto)

Samuel Vaiter (@vaiter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I wrote in my notes few years ago a *suboptimal* lower bounds of GD for smooth strongly convex function. Nesterov's proof uses seq w/ values in ℝ^ℕ (so infinite dimensional), whereas I do a similar strategy as in the convex case, ie in ℝ^n 1/3 samuelvaiter.com/intro-to-lower…

Alex Shtoff (@alexshtf) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An interesting thought. In most practical cases, you can easily reformulate any convex optimization problem equivalently with linear cost and "simple" (conic?) constraints. Same for its dual. CVXPY does it. So via strong duality, any convex opt. <==> convex feasibility. You can

Dirk L. (@dirque_l) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I sample points uniformly on the sphere and then look at them on a map (in longitude and z-coordinate). STILL UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED! 🤯 (Quite a nice fact that is special to three dimensions: Each coordinate of a random vector uniformly on the unit sphere is uniform in [-1,1].)

I sample points uniformly on the sphere and then look at them on a map (in longitude and z-coordinate).

STILL UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED! 🤯

(Quite a nice fact that is special to three dimensions: Each coordinate of a random vector uniformly on the unit sphere is uniform in [-1,1].)
Jonas Bresch (@j_j_e_w_b) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today at #ILAS25 in Taiwan: I will speak in MS4, join me a find out about or #stochastic #projected #gradient ascent method computing the #operator norm. I will provide rather new convergence rates. A co-work with Dirk L.

Today at #ILAS25 in Taiwan: I will speak in MS4, join me a find out about or #stochastic #projected #gradient ascent method computing the #operator norm. I will provide rather new convergence rates. A co-work with <a href="/Dirque_L/">Dirk L.</a>
Dirk L. (@dirque_l) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I usually also spend an hour or so on such a list when I teach linear algebra - but thinking that this sums up linear algebra is so wrong. Matrices are basically never square. Without least squares, min-norm and SVD, linear algebra is moot

Cohere Labs (@cohere_labs) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Join our ML Theory group next week as they welcome Tony S.F. on July 3rd for a presentation on "Training neural networks at any scale" Thanks to Andrej Jovanović Anier Velasco Sotomayor and Thang Chu for organizing this session 👏 Learn more: cohere.com/events/Cohere-…

Join our ML Theory group next week as they welcome <a href="/tonysilveti/">Tony S.F.</a> on July 3rd for a presentation on "Training neural networks at any scale"

Thanks to <a href="/itsmaddox_j/">Andrej Jovanović</a>  <a href="/aniervs/">Anier Velasco Sotomayor</a>  and <a href="/ThangChu77/">Thang Chu</a>  for organizing this session 👏

Learn more: cohere.com/events/Cohere-…
Dirk L. (@dirque_l) 's Twitter Profile Photo

And this guy created the beamer class for LaTeX to prepare the slides for his own PhD thesis defense. (No idea why he went on to create pgf and TikZ, though.) de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Till_Tant…

Nic Mücke 🦩 🇪🇺 (@moskitos_bite) 's Twitter Profile Photo

My issue with #NeurIPS2025: if a co-author fails to submit their assigned reviews, jointly submitted papers are not receiving reviews. Collective punishment is unfair and harmful, discouraging collaboration, penalizing innocent researchers, worsening the academic culture.

Dirk L. (@dirque_l) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A: A mathematical statement/concept makes intuitive sense. B: There is a framework where a mathematical statement/concept can be proven/defined. I tend to believe that A ⇒ B, but not vice versa. (Thinking about Dirac's delta and the Banach-Tarski paradox, for example.)

Dirk L. (@dirque_l) 's Twitter Profile Photo

a) is my go-to 1 that I use most of the time. c) is my choice for exponents (especially if it's -1). b) Only if it's a very important one.