The era of "fair" pricing is over: Welcome to predatory individualized surveillance pricing

Rebecc@ ███████ It could be that the reason Dems didn't release the Epstein files is that they are in them too. The fact that Dems didn't release them is not an excuse for Trump and Bondi failing to release them now. The two parties protect their own and each other.

Rebecc@ ███████ Dr. Angela Rasmussen Tony VanDongen Jim Haslam Richard H. Ebright ECLOGITE1 MJ Allen Dissenting Skeptic John Lorenzini lab-leaked-tariff Ab~ishek Zachary A. Klase TheWetMarket Entropy🌴Chase Emily Kopp Baric Laboratory Peter Daszak Bloom Lab Prof Francois Balloux Nod ScienceInsider John Travis Jocelyn Kaiser World Health Organization (WHO) Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel Bryce Nickels Edward Hammond Alina Chan John Sudworth Bioscience Resource Project Biosafety Now! BBC Breaking News I’m blocked by Angie, but let’s be real—that’s reasonably strong evidence. Firsthand researchers admitting to FCS insertion and serial passaging isn’t just some grant proposal.

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 Daily Caller Yes. Because blaming it on Chinese peasants eating bat soup is the totally non-racist theory.

Elon Musk Tesla Can you reconcile robots replacing human jobs as they do in this diner with your concern about falling fertility rates? People need jobs if they are going to have kids.

The irony is that most of the vocal scientists supporting the lab leak hypothesis have been clear that the accident is the shared responsibility of the US and China. We provided the research methods and critical technology. NIH funded insane gain-of-function on SARS viruses in

Tony VanDongen Rebecc@ ███████ Richard H. Ebright ECLOGITE1 MJ Allen Dissenting Skeptic John Lorenzini lab-leaked-tariff Ab~ishek Zachary A. Klase TheWetMarket Entropy🌴Chase Emily Kopp Baric Laboratory Peter Daszak Bloom Lab Prof Francois Balloux Nod ScienceInsider John Travis Jocelyn Kaiser World Health Organization (WHO) Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel Bryce Nickels Edward Hammond Alina Chan John Sudworth Bioscience Resource Project Biosafety Now! BBC Breaking News A bit like saying someone flying into Milan, or New York, would have to go straight to a nursing home to account for all those nursing home deaths. As if all those infected are always known. It's always been a nonsense argument.

Monty Hall’s Goat Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Zachary A. Klase Peter Daszak Dr. Angela Rasmussen Rebecc@ ███████ Tony VanDongen Jim Haslam Richard H. Ebright ECLOGITE1 MJ Allen Dissenting Skeptic lab-leaked-tariff Ab~ishek TheWetMarket Entropy🌴Chase Emily Kopp Baric Laboratory Bloom Lab Prof Francois Balloux ScienceInsider John Travis Jocelyn Kaiser World Health Organization (WHO) Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel Bryce Nickels Edward Hammond Alina Chan John Sudworth Bioscience Resource Project Biosafety Now! BBC Breaking News Talking about "manufactured appearance of peer review" - what was the review process like for Proximal Origin paper at Nature Medicine?

Dr. Angela Rasmussen Tony VanDongen Jim Haslam Rebecc@ ███████ Richard H. Ebright ECLOGITE1 MJ Allen Dissenting Skeptic lab-leaked-tariff Ab~ishek Zachary A. Klase TheWetMarket Entropy🌴Chase Emily Kopp Baric Laboratory Peter Daszak Bloom Lab Prof Francois Balloux ScienceInsider John Travis Jocelyn Kaiser World Health Organization (WHO) Bryce Nickels Edward Hammond Alina Chan John Sudworth Bioscience Resource Project Biosafety Now! BBC Breaking News You’re once again avoiding a live debate and failing to offer any scientific counter - which proves my point. If the goal is to prevent virologists from causing further pandemics, then talking to them is pointless. We should focus on journalists and policymakers instead.

All the expected evidence for zoonosis is missing. All the expected evidence for a lab leak exists.

But these Twitter "debates" are important. They remind us that (1) virologists haven't learned anything from their colleagues' disastrous mistakes. (2) they'll do the same sh*t again and cause a worse disaster, when the political scene becomes more favorable.

Nod Rebecc@ ███████ among the reeds Richard H. Ebright Holtz Nate Health Nerd Garry, Holmes, Rambaut, Suchard, Andersen, Worobey, Wertheim weren't. Multiple gross errors of basic reasoning now stand as the last word in the peer-reviewed scientific record on this topic. Regardless of which authors wrote or even read the paper, a correction is needed.

People are complaining that girls are still behind in math and it is URGENT that we address this gender gap immediately. Meanwhile, boys are behind in everything else, but we don’t see the same sense of urgency. Why?

The fact that it took 15 years!!! to retract this paper—which was shown to be wrong only a few weeks after it was published—is yet another clear example of why scientific journals should be relegated to the dustbin of history.

DID YOU KNOW? The bacterium at the center of this retracted 2010 paper was named GFAJ-1--short for “Give Felisa a Job”--a nod to lead author Felisa Wolfe-Simon. The strain’s name underscores the perverse incentives in science to over-hype non-results to advance your career.

Royce Lopez

Now the British need VPNs to know what's happening, just like the Chinese.