James Coleman (@energylawprof) 's Twitter Profile
James Coleman

@energylawprof

Energy law, trade, & regulation.
Professor @UofMNLawSchool, @AEI.
Previously: @SMULawSchool, @UCalgaryLaw, @HaskayneSchool, @Harvard_Law.

ID: 1575918264

linkhttp://j.mp/Blog_and_Bio calendar_today07-07-2013 20:04:57

6,6K Tweet

5,5K Followers

909 Following

Elizabeth McCarthy (@3lizabethmcc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If courts start treating vacatur as the exception, not the rule, it could ease the financial and legal uncertainty that makes NEPA such a hurdle. Predictable remedies matter as much as streamlined review.

Rick Pildes (@rickpildes) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Despite the Court's overturning of Chevron, the Court points out at every turn the importance of judicial deference to the agencies' application of NEPA. Thus, one how "detailed" a NEPA report must be, deference. On identifying significant environmental impacts and feasible

Kristin Hickman (@khickmanjd) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In today's #SCOTUS Seven Co. Infr. Coalition decision, emphasis on deference under State Farm when agencies exercise discretion vs Loper Bright's independent judgment for mere statutory interpretation. Fits neatly with Amy Wildermuth's & my draft article. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

James Coleman (@energylawprof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ā€œLow cost batteries are transformative, not simply because they complement solar but because of how they complement other energy generation.ā€ The buffer they provide works not just for solar v. demand mismatch but ā€œjust as well to smooth out variation in demand more generally.ā€

Aidan Mackenzie (@aidanrmackenzie) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SCOTUS Seven County decision is out! TLDR: It’s a big deal, it limits NEPA, it’s better than expected, BUT… there’s still uncertainty. The ruling does two things: - Calls for giving agencies more discretion - Sets clear limits on what EIS reviews have to consider 🧵(1/14)

SCOTUS Seven County decision is out!

TLDR: It’s a big deal, it limits NEPA, it’s better than expected, BUT… there’s still uncertainty.

The ruling does two things:
- Calls for giving agencies more discretion
- Sets clear limits on what EIS reviews have to consider
🧵(1/14)
Aidan Mackenzie (@aidanrmackenzie) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SCOTUS decision is a victory for limiting NEPA The first component of the decision is a clear call for giving agencies more *discretion* when preparing NEPA analyses, (i.e. how much leeway should agencies get when complying with NEPA) (4/14) x.com/EnergyLawProf/…

James Coleman (@energylawprof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ā€œJustice Brett Kavanaugh writing for the majority said use of NEPA to stymie energy and infrastructure programs has gotten out of hand and needs to be curtailed.ā€

ā€œJustice Brett Kavanaugh writing for the majority said use of NEPA to stymie energy and infrastructure programs has gotten out of hand and needs to be curtailed.ā€
James Coleman (@energylawprof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Back in 2018, I made ā€œthe counterintuitive case that studying how energy transport projects might affect upstream and downstream markets is unwiseā€ in environmental reviews. dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2018/is… The Supreme Court now agrees…

Seaver Wang (@wang_seaver) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Good observations by Elizabeth McCarthy, James Coleman that fixing the start/stop/redo dynamic in how courts approach remedies in permitting-related lawsuits is a good way to reduce project risks associated with the process, separate from how courts hold agencies accountable.

James Coleman (@energylawprof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ā€œVirginia today is full of data centers — 329 of them, handling as much as a third of the planet's internet traffic and consuming almost a fourth of the state's electricity in 2023.ā€

James Coleman (@energylawprof) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Discussed how different war scenarios in the Middle East could impact oil prices and eventually gasoline prices at the pump this morning with Vineeta Sawkar