All tools, web2 web3 whatever, end up here

Cobie toly 🇺🇸 ive watched at least 5 cycles of The Latest Grift and the problem didnt self-correct - the grifts got griftier and the losers lost harder and we all said "well maybe next time people will learn" except no one does and it becomes harder to explain what the point of it all is

imo, at this point it doesnt matter if youre a user, dev, vc, trader, influencer, or anything else. as long as your plan isnt to max extract and leave, then one of your main priorities should be working together to purge the people who are dragging our reputation through the mud

It seems very necessary to have an external, non-signer role involved in reviewing transactions from multisig wallets, whether it's a security auditor or an automated scanning service.

There are a lot amount of people capitalizing on this hack to sell their fancy multisig, semi-custodial, MPC, blah blah blah product to you. They say that they would've prevented this hack. Those products make your attack surface LARGER, not smaller. Do not believe their lies

Many valuable insights. Thanks Decurity for their transparency.

Onchain Activity ≠ Wallet Usage Wallet volume charts didn’t break due to wash trading from farming Binance Alpha points. They broke because Binance Alpha 2.0, a CEX-only product, is being misclassified as “Binance Wallet.” Let’s unpack what went wrong, and how to fix it 🧵

I can imagine that much smart detection and simulation work should/could be done from the client side with MetaMask.eth 🦊, Blockaid and many more.

100 ETH were assumed lost but could eventually be recovered. Here's what happened, how it became a happy ending and what's needed to prevent this from happening again. Context A user of Safe{Wallet} wanted to bridge 100 ETH from Mainnet to Base. But then they realized that they

World's first autonomous delivery of a car! This Tesla drove itself from Gigafactory Texas to its new owner's home ~30min away — crossing parking lots, highways & the city to reach its new owner

Maybe there's no need to hype about the Claude Code, because it will never officially use other LLM models like Gemini, Grok, or anything else.

Awesome to see Arkham quote research from the MilkSad vulnerability and writeup. milksad.info/posts/research… I was privileged to talk about this series of vulnerable btc wallets at 38c3 (December 2024) media.ccc.de/v/38c3-dude-wh…

using screenshots of something that isn't your own requires attribution, at the very least. This was research done by the Milk Sad team: milksad.info/posts/research… milksad.info/posts/research… "Milk sad" is a vuln that was disclosed 2y ago: CVE-2023-39910

Nice update and in-depth write-up by Christian Reitter and the Milk Sad team. I'm just curious about the wallet or software solution LuBian was using at that time. milksad.info/posts/research…