Fake “Unicode.” 🩵🆓 (@fakeunicode) 's Twitter Profile
Fake “Unicode.” 🩵🆓

@fakeunicode

⚠Mixed Case Punishment⚠

@ for 🔣 problems

🍐💉🧛

🤖canary:❗🤖

ID: 2183231114

calendar_today08-11-2013 23:59:06

75,75K Tweet

11,11K Followers

3,3K Following

Jay Bauman (@jaybauman1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's no exaggeration to say I was obsessed with Pee Wee Herman as a little kid. Pee Wee's Big Adventure is a perfect comedy and I still I reference this moment all the time.

Picas&Malagarriga (@femfum) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Albert Velasco Potser que hi posi el mateix en aquest ganivet Tuareg, mercadejat a l'Ahaggar (Hoggar) a mitjan dels 80? Incunabula Fake “Unicode.” 🩵🆓 Special Character …do you recognize this script (alphabet), perhaps is Tifinagh?

<a href="/velasc_alberto/">Albert Velasco</a> Potser que hi posi el mateix en aquest ganivet Tuareg, mercadejat a l'Ahaggar (Hoggar) a mitjan dels 80?

<a href="/incunabula/">Incunabula</a> <a href="/FakeUnicode/">Fake “Unicode.” 🩵🆓</a> <a href="/SpecialXaracter/">Special Character</a> …do you recognize this script (alphabet), perhaps is Tifinagh?
Matt Busche (@mrbusche) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Anyone aware of a #JavaScript library that sanitizes Unicode characters? I'm looking for something that replaces them with a meaningful replacement. For example, it'd replace ’ with ', ff with ff, etc. #nodejs

loren schmidt (@lorenschmidt) 's Twitter Profile Photo

pet peeve: as technological detritus from the era when every corporation was trying to cash in on the popularity of emoji, many unicode characters now are automatically replaced with emoji variants. even in text editors.

pet peeve: as technological detritus from the era when every corporation was trying to cash in on the popularity of emoji, many unicode characters now are automatically replaced with emoji variants. even in text editors.
myf (formerly myf) (@myfonj) 's Twitter Profile Photo

loren schmidt eli! 🐐 Fake “Unicode.” 🩵🆓 I did some research about how browsers obey variation selectors and forced fonts and summarised them around here: (tl;dr: yes, inconsistent even for glyphs that are told to be "monochromatizable" by Unicode standard.) x.com/myfonj/status/…

<a href="/lorenschmidt/">loren schmidt</a> <a href="/frozenpandaman/">eli! 🐐</a> <a href="/FakeUnicode/">Fake “Unicode.” 🩵🆓</a> I did some research about how browsers obey variation selectors and forced fonts and summarised them around here: (tl;dr: yes, inconsistent even for glyphs that are told to be "monochromatizable" by Unicode standard.)
x.com/myfonj/status/…
Benj Edwards (@benjedwards) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I just discovered that macOS 14.x adds an invisible character to its screenshot filenames just before the AM/PM that breaks compatibility with older image editors and other software Unicode 8239: "Narrow No-Break Space" (U+202F) Anybody know a member of the macOS dev team?

I just discovered that macOS 14.x adds an invisible character to its screenshot filenames just before the AM/PM that breaks compatibility with older image editors and other software

Unicode 8239: "Narrow No-Break Space" (U+202F)

Anybody know a member of the macOS dev team?