The Phil Woolas case highlights confusion in election law | Jacob Rowbottom gu.com/p/2ykxz/tw via The Guardian

@_UoWCIR Richard Baker Charter provisions not protected from legislative amendment. Point on entrenchment refers only to exec powers.

The online pornography debate in the UK replicates the US mid-1990s debate. So here is my 2003 paper with Jake Rowbottom papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Wednesbury attacked last month - not the legal decision, but the Gaumont Cinema building from that case. tinyurl.com/pb23rz6 #publiclaw

Fifty years since the death of the great free speech theorist Alexander Meiklejohn. #freespeech manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-new…

Do media laws restrict the election debate format? wp.me/pMDHB-7Cg #ElectionDebates

Do media laws constrain the election debates? wp.me/pMDHB-7Cg via Inforrm #GE2015

#Carmichael Line drawn between personal and political statements in the Woolas decision is puzzling. See comments in ojls.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/3/5…

The U.S. and Britain see corruption very differently. Here's why. wpo.st/rTJY1