Oh, FFS there’s an overwhelming amount of out of evidence. ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1…

stillgoing paul Andrew Neil Mail Online Yawn. The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?

Steven Andrew Neil Mail Online The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?

Anthony Paul Turnill Steven Andrew Neil Mail Online Basic physics and models predict that increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations leads to: ✅increasing temperatures ✅rising sea levels ✅receding glaciers and land ice ✅depleting sea ice ✅acidifying oceans ✅other lines of evidence All observed. zacklabe.com/climate-change…

Lord Ashcroft Andrew Neil In July 2024 85% of voters voted for parties with clear manifesto commitments to net zero on or before 2050. Every MP in parliament except Reform stood on those manifestos. It’s the overwhelming will of the people.

Carl Ward Gluon Vector L.A. Patrice POYET Fred Hikes🚶‍♂️Bikes🚴Camps 🏕 @Anvndarnamn5 Sir Autumn Mandrake Patrick Frank David Lawyerman caerbannog666 Kevin Hofner Rep Ken deGraaf, CO HD-22 Jim Java 👉@priscian 🦋 Bluesky 🦣 mastodon.social Jim Bowers Ecological Spirit Richard Werkhoven 🥛 @alangnixon @DoubleDumas Zebedee Benno List James William Owens LXX Researcher warmistwayne James Ecologist Rebecca Dr Jennine Morgan MilitaryMom🇺🇸 That Was Then This Is Now 🇺🇸 BeSteveL 🐝 RichC: joking through the stupidpocalypse Steve Wilson I C crap daily Ian Bell Borg-9 @BarbaraGirouard KissTheTruth @HmGinYYC ⌛️Darren Page🕊️🆓 ⛰️San Gabriel Mountains Trailbuilders ⛰️ Robert Hugh Peters Neal Heidler George Harrison 🌎⚡️🇨🇦🥗🚴Jouster Boryan LeChat M K Gandhi Atomsk's Sanakan Remi Michelle Hallack Mike Hudema Prof Michael E. Mann Every day Physics academics around the world receive unsolicited emails from self styled “independent thinkers” all claiming to have found the fatal flaws in Relativity or Quantum Mechanics. In the field of climate, Pat Frank is such a person.

Contrast how the authorities deal with farming protrst and those organising them, versus, for example, climate protestors. Blocking highways with tractors is far more effective than slow walking. And where are the journalists infiltrating the zoom calls organising them? Good Morning Britain

Bernie @TrevorHarlock The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?

Chris Martz The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?

David Siegel Great stuff David. Lots of strawman arguments and non sequiturs p, but doubtless you’ve convinced your susceptible followers. The people you really need to convince are the 20,000 climate scientists and every national science academy on the planet.

John Sullivan The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?

John Sullivan In July 2024 85% of voters voted for parties with clear manifesto commitments to net zero on or before 2050. Every MP in parliament except Reform stood on those manifestos. It’s the overwhelming will of the people.

Warspite 🇬🇧 Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎 warmistwayne That Was Then This Is Now 🇺🇸 James William Owens Diwedd Ecoladdiad Cymru Robert Hugh Peters KissTheTruth @Robert76907841 Dr Jennine Morgan ctsbillc James West Atomsk's Sanakan @DoubleDumas Jim Java 👉@priscian 🦋 Bluesky 🦣 mastodon.social Denis Daly Ecological Spirit TMGFlorida Sir Autumn Mandrake Patrice POYET Ogre in My Swamp The green angle Kevin Hofner Steve Wilson Marc Jones Rebecca Patrick Frank Visitor Richard Werkhoven 🥛 @Anvndarnamn5 Rep Ken deGraaf, CO HD-22 caerbannog666 David Lawyerman Zebedee Benno List LXX Researcher James Ecologist MilitaryMom🇺🇸 BeSteveL 🐝 RichC: joking through the stupidpocalypse I C crap daily Ian Bell Borg-9 ⌛️Darren Page🕊️🆓 ⛰️San Gabriel Mountains Trailbuilders ⛰️ Mark Ogge Oui Jérôme, c’est moi ! BONUS🌍 judith callaghan 🌱🌱🌱 The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?

Andrew Neil In July 2024 85% of voters voted for parties with clear manifesto commitments to net zero on or before 2050. Every MP in parliament except Reform stood on those manifestos. It’s the overwhelming will of the people.

Chris Martz You don’t have a clue how science is funded in the USA or elsewhere. You do know science the rest of the world agree that the climate is changing because of our carbon emissions. By definition funding for predetermined outcomes is not research. x.com/ejwwest/status…

James West Chris Martz But it’s very strange he blames Congress for funding climate scientists to support a regulatory agenda. The same Congress that rejected the Kyoto Protocols because it imposed a regulatory agenda on the USA. And which resisted any regulatory agenda after the Paris Climate Deal.

Chris Martz It’s odd you blame Congress for funding climate scientists to support a regulatory agenda. The same Congress that rejected the Kyoto Protocols because it imposed a regulatory agenda on the USA. And which resisted any regulatory agenda after the Paris Climate Deal.

Stephen Toby Young Antiques Roadshow One third of atmospheric CO2 is from human sources. The ANNUAL human contribution is about 4% of natural sources. This accumulates in the atmosphere, and the result is atmospheric CO2 levels have increased by 50% in the past 200 years. This is not scientifically controversial.

Chris Martz Do you endorse these types of post from your followers? Do tell.

Chris Martz Meanwhile a reminder that politicians demanding action on climate change is neither recent or “woke”. x.com/profmarkmaslin…