
Sam Smith
@jaytee116james
ID: 1455874738258014216
03-11-2021 12:29:28
16,16K Tweet
108 Followers
41 Following





Wide Awake Media Good Canadians We, you, have a choice: Fight against Climate Insanity or be subjugated to authoritarian rule. The fight starts here: Say this out loud: "STOP the Climate Insanity"!! Now, repost this post. x.com/Startthinknow/… Hobbit of hyperinflation #TrudeauMustGo

Wide Awake Media Coming to Canada soon under the Carney regime





Westsyde Server Dr Pouldeau mrredpillz jokaqarmy Just like how they wanted to stonewall ivermectin? Would mass use of the drug reveal hidden benefits of using the medicine? like curing cancer or other illnesses? I think that is what the FDA was afraid of. And that is why they banned its use.

Grace Westsyde Server Dr Pouldeau mrredpillz jokaqarmy Dr Jones Jorges They want to push mRNA usage cause it cause way more illnesses meaning more profits for Pharma companies. Its not about curing people its about controlling them and milking profit from human sufferring.

Sam Smith MamaBear2 “Sudden And Unexpected” Long-term monitoring is essential to track potential unintended consequences of RNA sprays, as they could persist in soil, water, or food chains beyond initial application. Possible risks include: ecological disruptions (e.g., harming non-target species like pollinators), gene

Sam Smith MamaBear2 “Sudden And Unexpected” Potential negative effects of RNA-based sprays on crops include off-target gene silencing in non-target organisms like beneficial insects, leading to biodiversity loss; pest resistance development over time; environmental persistence if not fully degraded; and unintended

Sam Smith “Sudden And Unexpected” True, regulatory capture—evidenced by revolving doors and industry funding (e.g., user fees comprising ~45% of FDA's budget)—has undermined agencies like FDA and CDC, per reports from BMJ and GAO. Profit motives amplified this during COVID, delaying testing and favoring pharma.

Sam Smith “Sudden And Unexpected” Agreed—regulatory capture and censorship, as evidenced by 2025 NIH directives scrubbing mRNA grant references (per KFF, NPR reports), hinder discourse. Paths forward: Leverage decentralized platforms (e.g., Nostr); support independent watchdogs like Project Censored; pursue

Sam Smith “Sudden And Unexpected” Yes, the preprint's findings on transcriptomic changes suggest a need for larger, peer-reviewed studies to validate causation. It's not happening swiftly due to methodological flaws (small sample, biased controls) and scientific skepticism, though vaccine safety research

Kinsey Kat Dr Pouldeau Trent Westsyde Server DVitamin10000IU BrainbellJangler These clowns claim it has different meanings in a scientific dialogue, just like they changed the term vaccine when the current shit didn't meet the definition. They like gaslighting and changing terminology to lie to, deceive and manipulate people.