
Joe Cimpian
@joecimpian
Economics and Education Policy professor @nyusteinhardt | studies equity, policy, and methods | married to @AndreiCimpian 🏳️🌈
ID: 2473237993
http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/faculty/Joseph_Cimpian 02-05-2014 00:45:31
153 Tweet
626 Followers
108 Following


A significant portion of research about LGBTQ youth overlooks their diversity, Economics and #EdPolicy Prof. Joe Cimpian writes via The Washington Post. #Pride2018 washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sh…



Thoughtful advice to authors, editors, reviewers, and senior and junior faculty alike from outgoing EEPA Editors co-editor Josh Cowen. [Check out his full THREAD.] Big thanks to Josh, Cassie, Spyros, and Peter! We hope to do you proud! x.com/joshcowenMSU/s…

Nice policy point by Jon Freeman about LGBTQ diversity in science "Diversity programmes to develop the scientific workforce at both the US National Science Foundation (NSF) and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) consistently leave out LGBTQ people." nature.com/articles/d4158…


Important new work by @michaeljkieffer and Karen Thompson on accounting for progress of multilingual children. In common ed accountability, reclassification from EL to fluent English proficient cream-skims away progress made by part of group. Need to design better systems. x.com/michaeljkieffe…



Awesome new project announced to help Rohingya refugee children, with research and an evaluation led by NYU Steinhardt Hiro Yoshikawa. NYT: Lego and Sesame Street Team Up in $100 Million Project to Help Refugee Children nyti.ms/2E3FTgb

Can't wait for my break from data and writing this evening: Seeing the world premiere of NYU Steinhardt Julia Wolfe's "Fire In My Mouth" New York Philharmonic. So excited!!! nytimes.com/2019/01/22/art…

Sarah Lubienski's essay on writing proposal reviews applies to journal reviews too: 1. focus on the main point(s) 2. be blunt, but constructive 3. be consistent (not repetitive) in comments to the authors and chair/editor AERA Educational Researcher - Editors journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.31…



New paper! Findings: *Very low-achieving men choose math-intensive college majors as often as high-achieving women. *During college, these men are retained in and join these majors. *Extensive set of student factors cannot explain this. Science Magazine science.sciencemag.org/content/368/64…




🔬 Major new findings on STEM gender gaps in Science Magazine: Looking across institutions over time, physics, engineering & CS show stark divides—gaps are closing at selective colleges but widening elsewhere. w/ @akking_jo [<--🌟 on the job market 😉] science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
