⚡️RPL⚡️ (@limosneror) 's Twitter Profile
⚡️RPL⚡️

@limosneror

ID: 927610910973353984

linkhttps://www.swanbitcoin.com/Limo calendar_today06-11-2017 18:57:30

1,1K Tweet

148 Followers

448 Following

Nick Szabo (@nickszabo4) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ray Dalio @Dr_Mario_MD What you're missing is that you're looking at shallow phenomena which usually change over historical time (e.g. volatility) rather than the huge risks inherent in modern trust-based and fiat money. If you think risk = volatility you won't get it.

Nick Szabo (@nickszabo4) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ray Dalio @Dr_Mario_MD Bitcoin is both trust-minimized (even more than gold) yet quite unlike gold digital & easily transferable in its trust-minimized form. It's an unprecedentedly superior form of money, but like anything else new traded in a free market, its historical journey starts off volatile.

Mechanic #FixTheFilters #300kb (@grassfedbitcoin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An OCEAN miner made a block rejecting all known arbitrary data His block earned 3.134 BTC = $352,969 If he would have included the available trash he would have added an extra 0.00293294 = $325.46 That's an additional 0.09% overall revenue A wise decision that all miners

An OCEAN miner made a block rejecting all known arbitrary data

His block earned 3.134 BTC = $352,969

If he would have included the available trash he would have added an extra 0.00293294 = $325.46

That's an additional 0.09% overall revenue

A wise decision that all miners
John S (@jstefanop1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

calle When you open with “core is a group of professionals that’s cares more than any other group” you kinda lost me There are plenty of “professionals” that care more about bitcoin as a monetary system than you guys I can assure you that (and have worked on it for way more than most

Matt Hill (@_matthill_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Calle is correct that Core developers can rightfully do whatever they want. They are not slaves. They don't owe anyone anything, except maybe the people who are paying them, but let's put that aside for a minute. As an open source dev who builds an open source OS designed for

Matt Hill (@_matthill_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I think the answer is: "they are developing for the people who want to USE the network" instead of "the people who CREATE the network".

Mechanic #FixTheFilters #300kb (@grassfedbitcoin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Here's what's going to happen: 1. 100KB OP_RETURNs become standard 2. Someone inevitably broadcasts something that triggers malware detection 3. All Bitcoin cloud infrastructure gets knocked offline 4. Major disruption - exchanges/pools go offline 5. Panic results in band-aid

Nick Szabo (@nickszabo4) 's Twitter Profile Photo

calle Fees protect the miners, but they don't provide enough disincentive to protect the full nodes. This has always been a problem, of course. But increasing the OP_RETURN allowance will likely make this problem worse. It also will increase legal risks.

Natalie Brunell ⚡️ (@natbrunell) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I have partnered with Bitkey to give away 2 hardware wallets to my followers - one to keep and one to give to a friend. All you need to do is like & RT this post and share in the comments below why you think Bitcoin self-custody is so important. Our favorite answer

I have partnered with <a href="/BitkeyOfficial/">Bitkey</a> to give away 2 hardware wallets to my followers - one to keep and one to give to a friend. 

All you need to do is like &amp; RT this post and share in the comments below why you think Bitcoin self-custody is so important. Our favorite answer