🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

The Independent Maternity Review into the Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust will close to new cases on the 31st May - today I asked the Leader of the House to join me in thanking Donna Ockenden FRSA, Hon DLitt Hon DSci, her team and the families involved 👇 Independent Maternity Review NUH Trust

An important message from Michelle Welsh MP on Nottingham’s maternity review in Parliament today AND renewed calls for news from Wes Streeting on what his plan is for ensuring maternity safety. ITV News Central

Congratulations to Shaun Lintern from The Times and The Sunday Times for being awarded highly commended in Health Journalist of the Year at The Press Awards 2025!

Exclusive: Sir Alan Bates makes major intervention on compensation for subpostmasters - accuses government of turning schemes into ‘kangaroos courts’ - assurances they would be non-legalistic and lack of documentation not a barrier now ‘worthless’ 1/3 thetimes.com/article/28b8d2…

Sir Alan also reveals his own battle to secure compensation has reached end of the road He has been given a final take it or leave it offer worth just 49.2% of his claim He is weighing up what to do next Others have similar and worse experiences and are deeply unhappy 2/3

He has now lost trust in the process. Today he calls for the creation of a new independent body to oversee publication sector scandal compensation and redress He outlines the idea in his Sunday Times piece 3/3 thetimes.com/article/47a7ad…

Leading Integrity After being elected as President of the British Psychological Society, I was legally obliged to report multiple apparent illegalities & criminal acts by senior officials. I support the drive to protect heroes and heroines of integrity. linkedin.com/posts/protect-…?

These little moments of disbelieve about my lived experience over the last 15 years still pop up unexpectedly from time to time…..

Anyone know if this will be available to watch in the UK / on-line?

Two external reviews ordered over trust’s high baby death rates ift.tt/idgvYkt

It has become clear that what Leeds Teaching Hospitals claimed in January was an 'independent review' of neonatal deaths was actually a self-served comparison of Dr Foster data, using self-selected criteria - Leeds has not shared this data or the criteria they used to get a favourable

Leeds Teaching Hospitals So now we know that: 1) there was no independent review of neonatal deaths as claimed by Leeds Teaching Hospitals 2) they then obfuscated to try to cover up their lie.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals And remember, Leeds Teaching Hospitals claimed there had been an independent review to 'reassure' parents after the BBC reported on the preventable deaths of 56 precious babies. What is going on at Leeds? And what else have they lied about? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

Emily Barley Leeds Teaching Hospitals Pure obfuscation with intent!

External reviews ordered over trust’s baby death rates at Leeds Hospitals NHS Trust - extremely distressing for families involved | News | Health Service Journal hsj.co.uk/quality-and-pe…

Good news from the EAT yesterday. I now have 3 separate appeals (10 grounds in total) ordered for a main appeal hearing. The latest is wasted costs against the NHS law firm Hill Dickinson. Here is the update on how they argued doctors out of whistleblowing protection - and you

*Author’s note: An AI take on the recent EAT order from Lord Fairley on Dr Day's Wasted Cost Application. No junior doctors were harmed in the making of this article, though several lawyers may feel a sudden pain in their costs schedules. Scene-setter: when your own contract is

The moment Lucy Letby’s legal team chose to go public with their expert concerns that the prosecution experts and the Chester neonatologists had made serious errors, this case became all about competence. The defence experts were staggered that the prosecution experts failed to

I was recently asked a very important question: why have I not referred other doctors, about whom I have serious concerns having reviewed their clinical input and witness statements, to the General Medical Council (GMC)? The reason is this - the fact as it stands is that GMC has

Svilena What is the purpose of regulations and regulators if they fail to regulate? Could it be that they are there as a public sop: to give the appearance of accountability without any actual, ehm, accountability?