🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Meta-analyses of published significant results (triangles) only, if we don't have access to non-significant results (circles) due to publication bias. "Meta-analytic Winner's Curse" GIF

Kind reminder: confounders are specific to X -> Y inference. Talking about "known confounders" means that they are known to be important to X -> Y, which often doesn't mix well with the argument that X -> Y has never been seriously investigated before

Remember when FASEB “representing 125,000 researchers” argued against the inclusion of preprints in NIH apps and reports?

Go/no-go training does not affect inhibitory control but changes the value of the stimuli. repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/hand…

In 2020, the global cost of peer-review was estimated at US $ 6,000,000,000. Institutions should acknowledge the importance of peer review in job descriptions, performance measurement, promotion packages, & funding applications .rdcu.be/daIYe

The UK Biobank has been an invaluable resource for advancing biomedicine, but it should be recognized that there is an important participation bias nature.com/articles/s4156… Nature Human Behaviour Tabea Schoeler Zoltán Kutalik @UNIL

Fredrik Jutfelt @jutfelt.bsky.social Anne Scheel SORTEE RegisteredReports Daniël Lakens eLife - the journal Michael Eisen Hope is great but one of the sad realities of academic publishing is that until proven otherwise, prestigious journals are essentially newspapers exploiting outcome bias, and one key indicator of being "otherwise" is offering RRs. If they don't or won't, you have your answer.

The main slide I want you to see is this...