🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

In the 1857 Dred Scott case, Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote what might be the most horrible decision the Court has ever made. More than 150 years later, descendants of the decision come together to figure out what reconciliation looks like. Listen here: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

🎙️NEW EP: When most people talk about expanding the Supreme Court, they're talking about adding a few justices. Two or four to the bench. Elie Mystal is not most people. He thinks we should just blow the lid and add 20 justices. 🎧 link.chtbl.com/notesfromameri…

More than 150 years later, two families grapple with one terrible Supreme Court decision. Listen here: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

The balancing act between individual liberty and public safety that we saw — and continue to see — during the COVID pandemic is as old as our country. This week: the origin story of the legal battles over vaccine mandates. Listen here: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

Emily is the best!!! We'll miss you Emily Madray! ❤️

Where do our rights over our own bodies end and our duties to others begin? In 1902, a Massachusetts pastor named Henning Jacobson refused to be vaccinated against smallpox. His decision sparked a Supreme Court case that still reverberates today. Listen: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

For a contrast to someone else in the news, listen to this More Perfect w julia longoria on David Souter, a justice with humility and an aversion to arrogating power in the judiciary who shied away from the spotlight podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rad…

A Massachusetts pastor named Henning Jacobson refused to be vaccinated against smallpox in 1902. His decision sparked a Supreme Court case that still reverberates today. From #TheExperimentPodcast, we're sharing "The Original Anti-Vaxxer." Listen here: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

Where do our rights over our own bodies end and our duties to others begin? An answer lies in the story of a 1905 Supreme Court case about government-mandated vaccines. From #TheExperimentPodcast, we're sharing "The Original Anti-Vaxxer." Listen here: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

If you missed All Of It With Alison Stewart yesterday, you can listen to our segment here: wnyc.org/story/more-per… And then don't miss today's episode of More Perfect about the Warhol decision and much more: link.chtbl.com/MorePerfect?si…

Two great podcasts with legal themes I enjoyed recently: No More Souters (on Justice Souter, Roe v Wade, importance of rule of law & precedent) More Perfect podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/rad… … and recently retired Mr Justice Mostyn on Off Air Times Radio podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/off…

This week on More Perfect, how does the Supreme Court interpret art? In the case, we have Andy Warhol, who claims he’s not making art. The photographer, who claims Warhol’s a copycat. And Supreme Court justices, who insist they are not art critics. Listen: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

A very fun listen, if I do say so myself... Here's a story about art, Warhol, Prince, 2 Live Crew, and wtf the Supreme Court is actually doing when it makes decisions. link.chtbl.com/MorePerfect?si…

Is law in the eye of the beholder? In our final episode of the season, the Supreme Court considers a case about copyright, art, Andy Warhol, and Prince. Listen here: bit.ly/41ZRLrJ

Shadow dockets, term limits, amicus briefs — what puzzles you about the Supreme Court? What stories are you curious about? We want to answer your questions in our next season. Leave us a voice memo here: bit.ly/46zVMpj

One wonderful part of working on More Perfect is seeing law professors and history teachers use the podcast in their lessons. We're now compiling all the examples we can find of this. Have you taught the podcast? Let me know!