MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile
MarikvR

@mvonren

Fmr federal gov’t (DoD, et al.) Occasional opinion @TheHill

ID: 1167922840097542145

calendar_today31-08-2019 22:11:26

8,8K Tweet

18,18K Followers

1,1K Following

@AskaPol_uaps (@askapol_uaps) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ask a Pol founder Matt Laslo's letter to NY Post editors after Steven Greenstreet libeled us publicly. "We were pleasantly surprised that within an hour of sending this letter, a NY Post editor called and apologized." FULL LETTER now public for first time at

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Pentagon STUMPED by UAP: Nov: "True anomalies" March: "Really peculiar" May: "The phenomena are so perplexing" (Dr. Kosloski: "Interesting cases that I, with my [science] background and time in the IC, I do not understand. And I don't know anybody else who understands them.")

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

1970-2020: No official UAP activity 2020: West declares “Little will come” of legislation 2022: House hearing 2023: Senate hearing 2023: UAP Disclosure Act 2023: House hearing 2024: House hearing 2024: Senate hearing 2025: 2 House hearings [TBD] TBD: “Age of Disclosure”

1970-2020: No official UAP activity

2020: West declares “Little will come” of legislation

2022: House hearing

2023: Senate hearing

2023: UAP Disclosure Act

2023: House hearing

2024: House hearing

2024: Senate hearing

2025: 2 House hearings [TBD]

TBD: “Age of Disclosure”
MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Pseudo-skeptic Mick West refuses to add the USS Jackson video - which shows TWO “Tic Tac” UAP flying in formation (!) - to his 3D simulator because the event is so anomalous. *There is more data for this incident than any other - enough to easily disprove West’s initial theory.*

Pseudo-skeptic Mick West refuses to add the USS Jackson video - which shows TWO “Tic Tac” UAP flying in formation (!) - to his 3D simulator because the event is so anomalous.

*There is more data for this incident than any other - enough to easily disprove West’s initial theory.*
MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mick West I don’t know why I need to repeat myself but Mick West engages in some of the most unscientific, biased practices and “analysis” imaginable - yet claims the mantle of science. As the world’s most prominent UAP debunker, he should be fully prepared to be called out. For example:

<a href="/MickWest/">Mick West</a> I don’t know why I need to repeat myself but <a href="/MickWest/">Mick West</a> engages in some of the most unscientific, biased practices and “analysis” imaginable - yet claims the mantle of science.

As the world’s most prominent UAP debunker, he should be fully prepared to be called out.

For example:
MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is called an “ad hominem” attack. West refuses to grapple with the data from the 2023 USS Jackson incident, in which two “Tic Tac”-shaped UAP fly in formation, so he resorts to personal insults and false insinuations. It’s profoundly unscientific - and enormously telling.

Limit (@superliminality) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Franklin Fields MarikvR I think Marik knows that trying to ‘win’ an argument with Mick is a fool’s errand. At risk of saying the quiet part out loud, despite appearances, I think Marik is trying to 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦 Mick by becoming a superior skeptic.

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mick West West: “It’s not at all clear what the ICIG was labeling credible and urgent, it might simply have been [Grusch’s] allegation of whistleblower reprisals.” The law firm and the then-vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee explicitly refute that. Lying or confused?

<a href="/MickWest/">Mick West</a> West: “It’s not at all clear what the ICIG was labeling credible and urgent, it might simply have been [Grusch’s] allegation of whistleblower reprisals.”

The law firm and the then-vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee explicitly refute that.

Lying or confused?
MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Steven Greenstreet 🐷 That’s strange, Steven Greenstreet 🐷. This statement from the FBI refers to “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” and not drones or “UAS.” With your intentional misquoting of Elizondo, this kind of misreporting appears to fit a trend. politico.com/news/2025/02/0…

<a href="/MiddleOfMayhem/">Steven Greenstreet 🐷</a> That’s strange, <a href="/MiddleOfMayhem/">Steven Greenstreet 🐷</a>.

This statement from the FBI refers to “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” and not drones or “UAS.”

With your intentional misquoting of Elizondo, this kind of misreporting appears to fit a trend.

politico.com/news/2025/02/0…
MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Extraordinary UAP Comments: -Trump -Obama -Clintons -Schumer -Rubio (SSCI/State) -Rounds (SSCI/SASC) -Gillibrand (SSCI/SASC) -Grusch (IC) -Brennan (CIA) -Kosloski (AARO) -Ratcliffe (DNI/CIA) -Haines (DNI) -Nelson (NASA) -McMaster (NSC) -Clapper (DNI) -Milley (JCS) -Rogers (NSA)

Skywatcher (@skywatcherhq) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Introducing UAP Modules. Skywatcher is launching a new series of short videos exploring the behavior of various UAP classes— including movement patterns, sensor observations, and emerging trends. Each video offers a focused, curated look at what our team is observing, one class

Introducing UAP Modules.

Skywatcher is launching a new series of short videos exploring the behavior of various UAP classes— including movement patterns, sensor observations, and emerging trends. Each video offers a focused, curated look at what our team is observing, one class
Libbey Dean (@libbeydean_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

NJ DRONES: I asked Transportation Sec. Duffy if a foreign adversary was behind the drone activity over New Jersey last October. His response: “With complete clarity — I don’t know.”

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mick West Don’t forget, Mick West, that CIA made “debunking” UAP incidents official U.S. government policy following the surge of sightings in 1952 (which culminated in the July DC incidents). Did that critical historical context make it into your book? cia.gov/readingroom/do…

<a href="/MickWest/">Mick West</a> Don’t forget, <a href="/MickWest/">Mick West</a>, that CIA made “debunking” UAP incidents official U.S. government policy following the surge of sightings in 1952 (which culminated in the July DC incidents).

Did that critical historical context make it into your book?

cia.gov/readingroom/do…
The Sol Foundation (@_solfoundation) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Sol Foundation and our sibling organizations are instigating a new effort to pass the UAP Disclosure Act (“UAPDA”), and we’re asking each of you to consider signing this petition in support of it: thesolfoundation.org/2025-petition/ This groundbreaking 2023 legislation was never passed

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is a fantastic initiative. Whether you are a skeptic, an agnostic, or a UFO/UAP “believer,” I encourage you to sign this petition. Transparency, with the presidential nexus mandated by the Disclosure Act, is the only path to getting to the bottom of this enduring mystery.

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Steven Greenstreet 🐷 Frizzy What did Kirkpatrick lie about, Steven Greenstreet 🐷? He told me twice (once in person and once on camera) that “Gimbal” is a balloon reflecting the sun. “Gimbal” was at night (and a ballon trajectory is absurd). Kirkpatrick is either grossly incompetent or a disinformation agent.

MarikvR (@mvonren) 's Twitter Profile Photo

BREAKING: CDR Fravor’s WSO During 2004 ‘Tic Tac’ Incident Revealed Per a 141-page BAASS analysis of the “Tic Tac” incident, CDR Fravor’s WSO was then-LT Josh Appezzato. CAPT Appezzato is now commanding officer of NAS Oceana: cnrma.cnic.navy.mil/About/Leadersh… H/t: Jonathan Davies 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧

BREAKING: CDR Fravor’s WSO During 2004 ‘Tic Tac’ Incident Revealed

Per a 141-page BAASS analysis of the “Tic Tac” incident, CDR Fravor’s WSO was then-LT Josh Appezzato.

CAPT Appezzato is now commanding officer of NAS Oceana:

cnrma.cnic.navy.mil/About/Leadersh…

H/t: <a href="/IWANTTOKNOWUK/">Jonathan Davies 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧</a>