Natalie Alkiviadou (@nataliealk) 's Twitter Profile
Natalie Alkiviadou

@nataliealk

Free speech, hate speech, the far-right, online platforms
Senior Research Fellow @SpeechFuture

routledge.com/search?kw=ALKI…

ID: 959759718188273666

linkhttp://www.nalkiviadou.com calendar_today03-02-2018 12:05:23

2,2K Tweet

1,1K Followers

770 Following

Schweizer Monat (@schweizermonat) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Die Rechtsprechung des EGMR zu Hate Speech schränkt die Meinungsfreiheit unverhältnismässig ein. Natalie Alkiviadou zeigt, wie Strassburgs paternalistischer Ansatz ein zentrales Grundrecht untergräbt.schweizermonat.ch/strassburgs-pa…

Columbia Global Freedom of Expression (@columbiagfoe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What better way to discuss hate speech than in the esteemed company of world-renowned experts? Together with DWT, grateful to host the NYC launch of Natalie Alkiviadou’s new book, alongside Mishi Choudhary, Aryeh Neier, and our director, Hawley Johnson.

What better way to discuss hate speech than in the esteemed company of world-renowned experts? Together with DWT, grateful to host the NYC launch of Natalie Alkiviadou’s new book, alongside Mishi Choudhary, Aryeh Neier, and our director, Hawley Johnson.
The Autistic Coach (@autisticcoach_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It’s not that autistic people don’t know how to join a conversation. It’s that people stop listening the moment we do. We become background noise in our own lives. Until someone else repeats what we've said - louder, safer, non-autistic. Then it's "brilliant".

Academy of Ideas (@acadofideas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Jenrick taking aim at 'activist judges' has caused a stir about UK's constitutional arrangements⤵️ Some see legalism & intruments like ECHR as barrier to democratic govt, while others fear loss of freedom & protection. Who's right? Shahrar Ali Natalie Alkiviadou  Exonerated barrister Jon Holbrook &

Jenrick taking aim at 'activist judges' has caused a stir about UK's constitutional arrangements⤵️

Some see legalism & intruments like ECHR as barrier to democratic govt, while others fear loss of freedom & protection. Who's right?

<a href="/ShahrarAli/">Shahrar Ali</a> <a href="/NatalieAlk/">Natalie Alkiviadou</a>  <a href="/JonHolb/">Exonerated barrister Jon Holbrook</a> &amp;
The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

When it comes to speech denying historical genocides, the European Court of Human Rights treats speech about some events very differently from others.

The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

At her book launch with Columbia Global Freedom of Expression, Natalie Alkiviadou argues that this reveals a significant problem with how hate speech laws are enforced in Europe. 📚 🔗 Learn more here: futurefreespeech.org/hate-speech-an…

The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"In her book 'Hate Speech and the European Court of Human Rights,' Natalie Alkiviadou . . . argues that Europe’s top human rights court has sent mixed signals on free expression." - via @bradyinberlin and Karla Adam washingtonpost.com/world/2025/10/…

The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🚨 NEW REPORT 🤖 We asked 8 major AI chatbots to generate content about lawful, but controversial issues. We then scored and ranked each chatbot, factoring in company policies, model behavior, transparency, and openness to debate.

🚨 NEW REPORT

🤖  We asked 8 major AI chatbots to generate content about lawful, but controversial issues. 

We then scored and ranked each chatbot, factoring in company policies, model behavior, transparency, and openness to debate.
Natalie Alkiviadou (@nataliealk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thanks to Institute H21 (global) for its invitation to discuss hate speech and free speech at this year's symposium. It was trully a pleasure. For the video see here youtube.com/watch?v=mH8Iwy… The Future of Free Speech

Thanks to <a href="/ih21_org/">Institute H21 (global)</a> for its invitation to discuss hate speech and free speech at this year's symposium. It was trully a pleasure. For the video see here 

youtube.com/watch?v=mH8Iwy…

<a href="/SpeechFuture/">The Future of Free Speech</a>
Natalie Alkiviadou (@nataliealk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

For anyone who wants to watch the full video of my book launch and discussion with Aryeh Neier and MishiChoudhary. Thank you to Columbia Global Freedom of Expression and #DavisWrightTremaine for making it happen. The Future of Free Speech youtube.com/watch?v=8iDee_…

The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Our new report gives the U.S. the highest marks for AI policies that respect freedom of expression. But that lead is fragile, Jacob Mchangama and @JordiCalBad write in an MSNBC op-ed.

Our new report gives the U.S. the highest marks for AI policies that respect freedom of expression. But that lead is fragile, <a href="/JMchangama/">Jacob Mchangama</a> and @JordiCalBad write in an <a href="/MSNBC/">MSNBC</a> op-ed.
Justin Hayes (@justin_hayes11) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I highly encourage those who believe Europe has a "sane" approach to free speech to read Alex's piece. bedrockprinciple.com/p/punishment-b…

The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

German “hate speech” laws are already troubling, but their enforcement has become alarmingly disproportionate, unconstitutional, and incompatible with a free society, writes Affiliate Fellow Alexander Hohlfeld .

German “hate speech” laws are already troubling, but their enforcement has become alarmingly disproportionate, unconstitutional, and incompatible with a free society, writes Affiliate Fellow <a href="/al_hohlfeld/">Alexander Hohlfeld</a> .
The Future of Free Speech (@speechfuture) 's Twitter Profile Photo

“While France prioritizes reputation protections, the U.S. champions a national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open,’” said Jacob Mchangama, quoting New York Times v. Sullivan.

“While France prioritizes reputation protections, the U.S. champions a national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open,’” said <a href="/JMchangama/">Jacob Mchangama</a>, quoting New York Times v. Sullivan.