PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile
PHAIR Consortium

@phairconsortium

The Pancreatobiliary and Hepatic Artificial Intelligence Research (PHAIR) Consortium. Focusing on clinically relevant and applicable AI tools voor HPB disease.

ID: 1621491924006838276

linkhttp://phair-consortium.com calendar_today03-02-2023 12:53:21

29 Tweet

78 Followers

13 Following

PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

#EAHPBA2023 E-AHPBA External validation of #radiomics preoperative fistula๐Ÿ’ง risk score (RAD-FRS) for Whipple ๐Ÿ”ช ! FIRST externally validated model of its kind โœ… Similar AUC to (ua)FRS in pre-op setting โœ… Great work by Ewout Ingwersen, Jacqueline Bereska and PHAIR Consortium!

#EAHPBA2023 <a href="/EAHPBA/">E-AHPBA</a> 

External validation of #radiomics preoperative fistula๐Ÿ’ง risk score (RAD-FRS) for Whipple ๐Ÿ”ช ! 

FIRST externally validated model of its kind โœ…
Similar AUC to (ua)FRS in pre-op setting โœ…

Great work by <a href="/EwoutIngwersen/">Ewout Ingwersen</a>, <a href="/JackieBereska/">Jacqueline Bereska</a> and <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a>!
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

#EAHPBA2023 E-AHPBA Segmentation model for ๐Ÿ”ฌ residual pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (ISGPP-2)! Model based on 528 pt, 14 centers, 7 countries๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ, 4 scanner types! Validated with by-scanner internal-external cross-validation ๐Ÿ“Š! F1 score of 0.78!

#EAHPBA2023 <a href="/EAHPBA/">E-AHPBA</a> 

Segmentation model for ๐Ÿ”ฌ residual pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (ISGPP-2)!

Model based on 528 pt, 14 centers, 7 countries๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ, 4 scanner types!

Validated with by-scanner internal-external cross-validation ๐Ÿ“Š! F1 score of 0.78!
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now ESGAR #ESGAR2023 Externally valid #radiomics preoperative fistula risk score (RAD-FRS) for Whipple! FIRST externally valid model of its kind โœ… Similar AUC (0.81) to (ua)FRS (0.79) in preop setting โœ… Great work Ewout Ingwersen, Jacqueline Bereska and PHAIR Consortium!

Now <a href="/EsgarSociety/">ESGAR</a> #ESGAR2023

Externally valid #radiomics preoperative fistula risk score (RAD-FRS) for Whipple!

FIRST externally valid model of its kind โœ…
Similar AUC (0.81) to (ua)FRS (0.79) in preop setting โœ…

Great work <a href="/EwoutIngwersen/">Ewout Ingwersen</a>,
<a href="/JackieBereska/">Jacqueline Bereska</a> and <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a>!
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ESGAR #esgar2023 PHAIR Consortium lead Inez Verpalen presents: ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ #ArtificialIntelligence based Assessment of Vascular Involvement and Resectability ๐Ÿ”ชon CT in patients with PDAC Segmentation ๐Ÿ“ธ below! Great work Jacqueline Bereska Boris Janssen and PHAIR Consortium โ—๏ธ

<a href="/EsgarSociety/">ESGAR</a> #esgar2023  

<a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a> lead <a href="/i_verpalen/">Inez Verpalen</a> presents:

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ #ArtificialIntelligence based Assessment of Vascular Involvement and Resectability ๐Ÿ”ชon CT in patients with PDAC

Segmentation ๐Ÿ“ธ below!

Great work <a href="/JackieBereska/">Jacqueline Bereska</a> <a href="/BorisJanssen/">Boris Janssen</a> and <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a> โ—๏ธ
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

EPC-Europ Pancr Club #EPC2023 Boris Janssen on behalf of PHAIR Consortium! AI residual cancer burden (RCB) to evaluate impact of NAT in resected pancreatic cancer! RCB ๐Ÿ”ฌ NAT vs. upfront: 2.2 vs. 10.3 mm2 p<0.0001 Survival ๐Ÿ“ˆ Above vs. below median RCB: 24 vs. 30 months. p=0.018

<a href="/EurPancClub/">EPC-Europ Pancr Club</a> #EPC2023

<a href="/BorisJanssen/">Boris Janssen</a> on behalf of <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a>! 

AI residual cancer burden (RCB) to evaluate impact of NAT in resected pancreatic cancer! 

RCB ๐Ÿ”ฌ
NAT vs. upfront: 2.2 vs. 10.3 mm2
p&lt;0.0001

Survival ๐Ÿ“ˆ
Above vs. below median RCB: 24 vs. 30 months. 
p=0.018
Marc Besselink (@marcbesselink) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can #AI based models predict the risk of #PancreaticCancer in #IPMN? โฌ‡๏ธ Scoping review BJS PHAIR Consortium open access link: doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znโ€ฆ phair-consortium.com #alvleesklierkanker #SoMe4HPB

Can #AI based models predict the risk of #PancreaticCancer in #IPMN?  
โฌ‡๏ธ
Scoping review <a href="/BJSurgery/">BJS</a> <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a>  open access link:
doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znโ€ฆ
phair-consortium.com

#alvleesklierkanker #SoMe4HPB
Giovanni Marchegiani (@gio_marchegiani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The future of IPMN management ๐Ÿ‡ will be based on two pillars ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Biomarkers and AI ๐Ÿค– Twelve AI based models to assess the risk of malignancy already exist! ๐Ÿ˜ข Methodological quality and reliability still to be improvedโ€ฆ letโ€™s work on it!! ๐Ÿ†“ read ๐Ÿ‘‰academic.oup.com/bjs/advance-arโ€ฆ

The future of IPMN management ๐Ÿ‡ will be based on two pillars 

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Biomarkers and AI

๐Ÿค– Twelve AI based models to assess the risk of malignancy already exist!

๐Ÿ˜ข Methodological quality and reliability still to be improvedโ€ฆ letโ€™s work on it!! 

๐Ÿ†“ read ๐Ÿ‘‰academic.oup.com/bjs/advance-arโ€ฆ
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

๐Ÿ“ข: Alberto Balduzzi Boris Janssen and PHAIR Consortium in BJS ๐Ÿ“ˆ 12 imaging-based AI models to predict malignancy of IPMN ๐Ÿ“Š Methodologically suboptimal ๐Ÿ”Ž Methodologically robust prospective studies incl. non-surgical patients required! Read: academic.oup.com/bjs/advance-arโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ“ข: <a href="/albe_balduzzi/">Alberto Balduzzi</a> <a href="/BorisJanssen/">Boris Janssen</a> and <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a> in <a href="/BJSurgery/">BJS</a> 

๐Ÿ“ˆ 12 imaging-based AI models to predict malignancy of IPMN 

๐Ÿ“Š Methodologically suboptimal

๐Ÿ”Ž Methodologically robust prospective studies incl. non-surgical patients required! 

Read: academic.oup.com/bjs/advance-arโ€ฆ
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This week ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Inez Verpalen Jacqueline Bereska etc. from Amsterdam UMC visit ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ดร…smund A. Fretland Knut Jรธrgen Labori in the Oslounivsykehus! External validation of a CRLM CT segmentation model! ๐Ÿ“ธ Discussions on imaging-based response evaluation to neoadjuvant therapy in both liver and pancreas! ๐Ÿ’‰

This week ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ <a href="/i_verpalen/">Inez Verpalen</a> <a href="/JackieBereska/">Jacqueline Bereska</a> etc. from <a href="/amsterdamumc/">Amsterdam UMC</a> visit ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด<a href="/AAFretland/">ร…smund A. Fretland</a> <a href="/knutjla/">Knut Jรธrgen Labori</a> in the <a href="/Oslounivsykehus/">Oslounivsykehus</a>! 

External validation of a CRLM CT segmentation model! ๐Ÿ“ธ

Discussions on imaging-based response evaluation to neoadjuvant therapy in both liver and pancreas! ๐Ÿ’‰
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Last week radiogist Hรฅvard Bjรธrke Jenssen from ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ดOslounivsykehus visited the ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ @AmsterdamUMC HPB team! Sharing and aligning HPB CT segmentation โœ๏ธ strategies with Yung Nio, Jacqueline Bereska Inez Verpalen and others! ๐Ÿ“ธ Visit finalized with the annual @AmsterdamUMC HPB BBQ!

Last week radiogist Hรฅvard Bjรธrke Jenssen from ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด<a href="/Oslounivsykehus/">Oslounivsykehus</a> visited the ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ @AmsterdamUMC HPB team! 

Sharing and aligning HPB CT segmentation โœ๏ธ strategies with Yung Nio, <a href="/JackieBereska/">Jacqueline Bereska</a> <a href="/i_verpalen/">Inez Verpalen</a> and others! ๐Ÿ“ธ

Visit finalized with the annual @AmsterdamUMC HPB BBQ!
Giovanni Marchegiani (@gio_marchegiani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The first ever Radiomics ๐Ÿ‘พ preoperative fistula risk score !!! Development ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ and external validation ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿณ The radiomics-based preop FRS performed similarly to the existing scores ( ROC 0.8) ๐Ÿ’ช Great added value considering only CT derived data! academic.oup.com/bjsopen/articlโ€ฆ

The first ever Radiomics ๐Ÿ‘พ preoperative fistula risk score !!!

Development ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ and external validation ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

๐Ÿณ The radiomics-based preop FRS performed similarly to the existing scores ( ROC 0.8)

๐Ÿ’ช Great added value considering only CT derived data!  

academic.oup.com/bjsopen/articlโ€ฆ
PHAIR Consortium (@phairconsortium) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now in BJS Open! Externally valid #radiomics pre-op fistula risk score (RAD-FRS) for Whipple! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ FIRST externally valid model โœ… Similar AUC (0.81) to (ua)FRS (0.79) in preop setting ๐Ÿ“ท ๐Ÿ‘ Ewout Ingwersen, Jacqueline Bereska and PHAIR Consortium! academic.oup.com/bjsopen/articlโ€ฆ

Now in <a href="/BjsOpen/">BJS Open</a>! 

Externally valid #radiomics pre-op fistula risk score (RAD-FRS) for Whipple! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 

FIRST externally valid model โœ… Similar AUC (0.81) to (ua)FRS (0.79) in preop setting ๐Ÿ“ท 

๐Ÿ‘ <a href="/EwoutIngwersen/">Ewout Ingwersen</a>, <a href="/JackieBereska/">Jacqueline Bereska</a> and <a href="/PHAIRconsortium/">PHAIR Consortium</a>! 

academic.oup.com/bjsopen/articlโ€ฆ
Giovanni Marchegiani (@gio_marchegiani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

๐ŸŽ„ Pancreas 2023 Wrapped! ๐Ÿพ ๐Ÿ”Ÿ October 2023: The use of radiomics ๐Ÿค– in pancreas surgery... future or present?! ๐Ÿง Is radiomics already impacting your clinical practice? ๐Ÿซต This is the first tool to predict the risk of POPF ๐Ÿณ

๐ŸŽ„ Pancreas 2023 Wrapped! ๐Ÿพ

๐Ÿ”Ÿ October 2023: The use of radiomics ๐Ÿค– in pancreas surgery... future or present?!

๐Ÿง Is radiomics already impacting your clinical practice? ๐Ÿซต 

This is the first tool to predict the risk of POPF ๐Ÿณ