
Philip Aldrick
@philaldrick
Senior economics reporter, Bloomberg @economics @bloomberguk
ID: 403453916
02-11-2011 14:34:48
12,12K Tweet
20,20K Followers
1,1K Following


My Financial Times article ft.com/content/460189… on why centralizing infrastructure investment via gilt financing will curtail growth and place greater pressure on the public finances. Instead the Chancellor can unleash billions in investment for large-scale projects using public


Starmer faces a brewing rebellion over £5 billion benefit cut bloomberg.com/news/articles/… via Ailbhe Rea Lucy White Joe Mayes






Flagging my latest for @bylinetimes in which I expressed sympathy for Rachel Reeves, whose "misfortune is to be the teller of hard truths in a country only interested in easy answers." If only her party listened to what the markets are saying about Britain subscribe.bylinetimes.com/edition/75/pol…



My article today - why every leftwinger should have Rachel Reeves as their hero. Her fiscal rectitude lowers interest rates, and allows the government to spend more on healthcare etc. Read (free) in the excellent The House magazine politicshome.com/opinion/articl… (1/2)


Bloomberg Bloomberg Economics scorecard on Labour’s first year in power Growth/living standards: 6/10 Lifting employment: 3/10 Delivering stability: 2/10 Ending austerity: 7/10 Housebuilding: 8/10 Overall: 26/50 Via Philip Aldrick Dan Hanson bloomberg.com/news/features/…

Some really interesting stuff in here by Philip Aldrick. Labour has actually done relatively well on ending austerity and building houses, and ok on growth. But the political circus and rebellions mean voters may well not notice. And now there’s a big problem on fiscal stability.