Perhaps is it still time to stop these nuts. We need to pull together and be vocal. At least follow back!

It's not just a matter of being wrong, they should be held accountable. Making stupid catastrophic forecasts and escaping unscathed is a disgrace to scientific integrity. Despite his 11,000 citations Wardhams' legacy is ruined. researchgate.net/profile/P-Wadh…

#canicule : En août 1923 : 44 °C à Toulouse (record absolu). 2023 : 42,4 °C, présenté comme "record absolu" 🤔 Effacer ou minimiser le passé pour gonfler l’exceptionnel du présent, c’est de la communication, pas de la science. 🌡️📉. 📜 Via le MétéoGroupe / Fb

You know what is absolutely hilarious about the whole climate movement? It has been one giant colossal FAILURE. Hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars have been funneled into “research” and “mitigation” on this for the last 40 years, yet none of it has made the slightest dent

What could go wrong? They must have a solid theory that stands scrutiny!

Peer-reviewing is broken, "Science" and "Nature" have lost their credibility. At some point there will be some price to pay.

This is how you manufacture scientific consensus.

The stratosphere still has unprecedented amounts of water-vapor from the Hunga-Tonga volcano which coincides with the unprecedented 2023/24/25 heat spike. The woke media is trying to hide this unprecedented event ... acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/…

"We're in a CO₂ famine now... It's unbelievable that they've managed to turn this beneficial gas, a part of life, into a threat." Leading physicist and Princeton emeritus professor, Dr. William Happer: "They talk about carbon pollution. I can't imagine what they're talking

Here's the actual "State of the Climate in 2024" report: 1. There is still no direct scientific evidence that emissions have caused any change in temperatures, weather or climate. 2. There have been no changes in any sort of extreme weather event that even correlates with

Mesure ineptes, théorie foireuse, l'imposture climatique est un mal moderne d'une très grande gravité. Une véritable psychose de masse.

9 years ago I detected a regime shift in Sep Arctic sea-ice extent. wattsupwiththat.com/2016/10/07/evi… I was strongly criticized. tamino.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/ext… Now a polar scientist confirms it. But, models can't simulate climate regime shifts, so they aren't understood. agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.102…

In the early 90s, CSTB was on top of the AI world in engineering, well that's NotebookLM that says it, not me. That's now for the history of computer science, but I spent time digitizing the "Reference Manual" of the XPDI station. It's free, it's history: researchgate.net/publication/39…

Investors in offshore wind developer Orsted can see the game is up and they can feel it in their pockets.

No, global hurricanes are not becoming more frequent — actually slightly less over the satellite era even though starting at a relative lull in the 70s and 80s ICJ, for instance, incorrectly claim hurricanes are becoming "more frequent" (p34, icj-cij.org/sites/default/…)

Economies in Europe are being devastated by over-regulation and the green delusion, but voters seem to ask for more of the same. Let's add a military-industrial complex that we can't need less: zerohedge.com/energy/europes…

Although the five authors did not dare to question the very precepts of the controversial theory of anthropogenic global warming (and they should), they attempt to restore a modicum of reason to the assessment of the effects of CO2. energy.gov/sites/default/…