🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Entirely new vaccines against diseases for which there is no existing vaccine *are* tested against placebo New versions of vaccines are not because it is unethical to do so E.g testing a new measles vaccine against placebo-and let people get measles- would not be ethical

Alright let's clear this up. New vaccines *are* tested against placebo (a dummy treatment). If a good vaccine already exists, a new version of it is tested against the old vaccine and not a placebo because it would be unethical to let people get the infection. Got that? Good

Dr. Peter McCullough is back—this time reviving an old myth about Japan “banning” the MMR vaccine. Here’s the full story (with receipts) on what actually happened, and what the science says about MMR safety. 🧵 #VaccinesWork #MMR #Disinfo

Of all the NHS cuts being forced by this government’s draconian spending targets, those to palliative care are especially horrifying. At exactly the time MPs debate assisted dying, we face removing care from dying people. How can you bear to oversee this, Wes Streeting?

1/ Nick Hulscher is at it again—claiming a rat study “proves” COVID mRNA vaccines destroy 60% of women’s egg supply. Let’s walk through what the study actually says—and what it doesn’t. Spoiler: It says nothing about women, fertility, or a 60% loss.

The recent Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® article as usual, has tons of mistakes about vaccine myocarditis/ prognosis/ epidemiological data. First off, if you are both on the board of your journal and a writer, there is a significant conflict of interest. Scientific journal articles are not

Blocking me won't help me read your posts much, Michael Huff

@RCPsych cannot support the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill for England and Wales in its current form and is once again urging MPs to look at our concerns ahead of the pivotal Commons Report stage debate and Third Reading. More here: rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-featu…

Past everyone’s bedtime but an absolute bombshell statement from the Royal College of Psychiatrists: —The bill “makes no provision to assess unmet needs” such as “intolerable pain, financial hardship and inadequate care or housing” —The role Leadbeater has given psychiatrists

Peace be with you all! This is the first greeting spoken by the Risen Christ, the Good Shepherd. I would like this greeting of peace to resound in your hearts, in your families, and among all people, wherever they may be, in every nation and throughout the world.

How confident of their narrative, or the quality of their "research", and how willing to engage in discourse with their critics are McCullough Foundation, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH? I suspect not much: I'm blocked by 2 out of 3 so far.

Total dismantling of the case for the Assisted Suicide Bill being debated today, by leading palliative care doc (who isn't actually opposed to Assisted Suicide)

One for your info and deliberations today, please, Jerome Mayhew

As you don’t allow replies Dr. Urso … Your evidence for this claim is? Is it the flawed study where they gave rats a full human dose, ie 300 times what they’d have for their weight? You might want to read this: x.com/IntegralAnswer…

Here’s block-those-who-challenge-you CitizenGO still demonstrating their misunderstanding, or wilful misrepresentation, of the pandemic treaty.

1/ Peter McCullough is once again distorting science to push vaccine fear. Here’s a breakdown of his latest post and why it’s dangerously misleading.

The Controversial Claims of Dr. James Thorp on COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy

This is excellent.

1/ A Korean study is making waves—claiming nearly half of patients with serious COVID vaccine adverse events died within 6 weeks. Antivaxxers are using it to push “hundreds of thousands dead” narratives. Let’s unpack what the study really says—and what it doesn’t.

1/ Peter McCullough is back with another bombastic headline: “Genetic Bombshell! COVID-19 Vaccines Change the Human Genome” Let’s break it down: what he claims, what the science actually says, and what pattern his recent writings follow.