Roland Grad (@rolandgrad) 's Twitter Profile
Roland Grad

@rolandgrad

Family doc and author of 'Look it up! What patients, doctors, nurses, and pharmacists need to know about the internet and health'.

ID: 3044578125

linkhttps://www.mcgill.ca/familymed/roland-grad calendar_today18-02-2015 14:08:56

181 Tweet

272 Followers

240 Following

Roland Grad (@rolandgrad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Since 2006, the daily POEM has been delivered to CMA members. Just want to thank the CMA and their team of librarians for having provided this information. ⁦Canadian Medical Association⁩ ⁦markebell⁩ ⁦@Info_Mastery⁩ #EBM …8aba341525ea.marketingusercontent.com/m/messageconte…

McGill University (@mcgillu) 's Twitter Profile Photo

L’Université McGill demande au premier ministre François Legault de revenir sur sa décision, invoquant les effets dévastateurs des mesures annoncées sur le Québec et sur l’Université mcgill.ca/newsroom/fr/ch…

L’Université McGill demande au premier ministre François Legault de revenir sur sa décision, invoquant les effets dévastateurs des mesures annoncées sur le Québec et sur l’Université
mcgill.ca/newsroom/fr/ch…
Renee Pellerin (@reneepellerin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Patients and doctors need to understand this: Why screening guideline committees should not include ‘experts’ as voting members healthydebate.ca/2024/02/topic/… via Healthy Debate densebreastscanada

Anssi Auvinen (@auvinen_anssi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An excellent review about naive overoptimistic views and expectations regarding screening. An eyeopener about the key issues that everyone engaged in discussion about screening should be familiar with. Warmly recommended! cfp.ca/content/69/11/…

Roland Grad (@rolandgrad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We suffer from too many "know-it all" experts in Medicine. We need more high quality science. See e-letters to 'Debunking myths about screening'. cfp.ca/content/69/11/… #EBP

Karsten Juhl Jørgensen (@karstenjuhl) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Kimpo393 @sciencensmiles CTFPHC | GECSSP We generally cannot and should not be able to choose any intervention we like, even where the evidence is weak or absent. This principle would not be responsible or ethical. For screening nor treatments. That cancer inevitably spreads we now know very well is not correct.

Renee Pellerin (@reneepellerin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Recommend this webinar explaining and backgrounding the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care draft breast screening guidelines. youtube.com/watch?v=EhcrfE…

Roland Grad (@rolandgrad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

When to engage in SDM? A challenge for resident physicians and physician educators. See ‘Family medicine residents’ perspectives on shared decision-making: A m... sciencedirect.com/science/articl… #FOAMed Glyn Elwyn @glynelwyn.bsky.social Samira A.Rahimi, Ph.D.

Roland Grad (@rolandgrad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Here are the ‘Top 20 Research Studies of 2023 for Primary Care Physicians’. Summarizing best-of-the-best research for decision making in primary care. Thank you AFP. ⁦markebell⁩ ⁦⁦@Info_Mastery⁩ ⁦Dr Jessica Otte, CCFP, FCFP🇨🇦 - palliative/FP⁩ #EBM aafp.org/pubs/afp/issue…

Roland Grad (@rolandgrad) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Reassuring. We do prescribe a lot of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors for BPH. No association with prostrate cancer ⁦markebell⁩ ⁦@Info_Mastery⁩ podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/pri…