Steven Hamilton (@shamiltonian) 's Twitter Profile
Steven Hamilton

@shamiltonian

Assistant Professor of Economics @GWtweets | Columnist @FinancialReview | Visiting Fellow @Austaxpolicy | Author "Australia's Pandemic Exceptionalism" | 🇦🇺

ID: 2997573846

linkhttp://steven-hamilton.com calendar_today26-01-2015 23:37:21

42,42K Tweet

18,18K Followers

1,1K Following

Steven Hamilton (@shamiltonian) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is not hard. If the OBBB is passed, debt will rise from 100% of GDP today to 124% of GDP by 2035. If it is not passed, debt will rise to 117% of GDP by 2035. The “baseline” debate is a distraction from the main issue, which is that the US budget is unsustainable either way.

Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦 (@jessicabriedl) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Perhaps unnoticed is how DC's conservative think tanks - many of whom supported the TCJA - are nearly united in opposition to the OBBB. The cost is just too high, the policies too silly, and GOP claims (no cost, huge growth) too ridiculous. Still, some admirable independence.

Clifford Asness (@cliffordasness) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Both ass ends of the horseshoe agree on the idiotic “no tax on tips” and “no tax on overtime.” Comforting that we can still all get along about some really really stupid things.

Both ass ends of the horseshoe agree on the idiotic “no tax on tips” and “no tax on overtime.” Comforting that we can still all get along about some really really stupid things.
Tax Policy Center (@taxpolicycenter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

TPC estimates that economic growth from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), as passed by the House, would offset less than 10 percent of its $2.4 trillion net cost. Read more here: tpc.io/45oqW4S

TPC estimates that economic growth from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), as passed by the House, would offset less than 10 percent of its $2.4 trillion net cost. Read more here: tpc.io/45oqW4S
Steven Hamilton (@shamiltonian) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You can read my column in today's Financial Review here. The greatest error of the Albanese government’s first term was failing to take economics seriously. In order for anything to get better, there is going to need to be a major change in mindset.

You can read my column in today's <a href="/FinancialReview/">Financial Review</a> here. The greatest error of the Albanese government’s first term was failing to take economics seriously. In order for anything to get better, there is going to need to be a major change in mindset.
Becky Quick (@beckyquick83) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Australia’s independent agencies are far too consensus-based. It reinforces a ‘clubby’ and insular culture that resists challenge and change.

Jeff Stein (@jstein_wapo) 's Twitter Profile Photo

One thing that’s genuinely novel to me about this tax bill is that at least three major models have “dynamic” scoring estimates — estimates that account for subsequent economic growth — finding the bill to be more, not less, expensive, because higher interest costs slow growth

Steven Hamilton (@shamiltonian) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A terrible policy that should be a major national scandal and absolutely abhorred by the left more than anyone else is promoted unapologetically and proudly by this Labor government.

A terrible policy that should be a major national scandal and absolutely abhorred by the left more than anyone else is promoted unapologetically and proudly by this Labor government.
Econo ad absurdam (@econoadabsurdam) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There's obviously a lot of mood affiliation going on when the hardcore neoliberals come out arguing against giving money to wealthy people but somehow they don't get a shred of credit for that position from the touchy feely types