NEW RULE: Any paper that uses "Nowadays" or "Now-a-days" in the Abstract is a papermill product. Change my mind...

RIP Larry's h-index, all of his citations have been removed by Google Scholar. Clients of the papermill who received citations by the same method still have them, so this is a gross act of ailurophobia. scholar.google.com/citations?user…

With Random Precision forbetterscience.com/2024/08/07/wit…

Elisabeth Bik Smut Clyde, X-Ray Haruspex I'm using this account to document and expose all instances of harassment and fraud by Matthew

The dignity wraith extends his tentacles, only to find nothing to suck.

Do not listen to the voices! They do not have your best interests in mind!

undark.org/2024/09/11/the…

Some peer-reviewers looked over these images and thought "Yes, that's exactly what mammospheres and colony plates and Transwell images should look like!"

The clowns. They're everywhere. Can't sleep or they'll get me.

Congratulations to Reese Richardson on his successful PhD defense. For a youngster 😛 he’s already had a huge impact on research integrity. 🥂 reeserichardson.blog/2024/10/15/the…

OF COURSE they know everything already. Otherwise they wouldn't be able to tell their advisors exactly what advice they want to receive.

Hope to have a blogpost on the topic finished RSN.

This is how to pedant.

I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I do not have the ability to comment on your speculations.

Leonid says that only Elsevier and Barcelo received this message. Some speculate that these guys are a reputation management effort and that they offer this as a service. "Retaliate against your critics!" Of course forgetting about the Streisand Effect along the way.