Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile
Nik Starow

@starowniklas

30+ years in Labor Law.
Decided to try out this "lawtube" thing.

Fun fact: Enjoys pro-wrestling. Have a farm. Sleeps 2 x 3,5 hours per day.

ID: 963339387303092224

linkhttps://linktr.ee/NikStarow calendar_today13-02-2018 09:09:42

47,47K Tweet

4,4K Followers

1,1K Following

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Has Brennan forgotten that all these numbers are from Aperture? Is Brennan claiming that Apertures data isn't reliable? That the defense expert should have checked for more errors?

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now Brennan is in complete asshole-mode. Mr Brennan, it's your experts data he is using. If your experts didn't test things, its not Mr DiSogra's fault. It's yours.

Amy Leigh (@iamyleigh) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There was a case in California in 2021 in which Dr Welcher testified. Because of Dr Welcher's report a mistrial was declared citing Dr Welcher's testimony as "junk science" #KarenReadTrial

There was a case in California in 2021 in which Dr Welcher testified.  Because of Dr Welcher's report a mistrial was declared citing Dr Welcher's testimony as "junk science"

#KarenReadTrial
Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Way to go to open that door Mr Brennan. In 8 months. 19 logged events. After 5:07, presumable the majority in the states custody, in Proctors custody. There were 11 in one day. "Mr DiSogra. Can an event be triggered by smashing a taillight to 47 pieces?"

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Perfect summary of the states case by Mr Jackson. Garbage in (Proctor, Buchanek, Paul, McCabe, Higgins, Albert, Burgess, Welcher, Brennan etc) Garbage out.

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Slightly Buzzed Friday Law Show - Karen Read Defense case in chief begins. Grab a beverage of choice, relax and let the snark go wild! youtube.com/live/1HZ0h33kI…

Slightly Buzzed Friday Law Show - Karen Read Defense case in chief begins. 

Grab a beverage of choice, relax and let the snark go wild!

youtube.com/live/1HZ0h33kI…
Dani Ahn Direct (@daniahndirect) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's my BIRTHDAY! Let's enjoy some pedo catching and have a little news and trial round-up! It is going to be fun! youtube.com/live/tFiiwNDVT…

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Rushin v Georgia DOL - Appeal before Judge McBurney Mr Rushin was terminated with cause, now he is in front of Judge Burney, arguing against this. youtube.com/live/Jb3ixfZ5w…

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I would not now, not ever, recommend this supposed lawyer for anything then a trip to the state bar. 1. He was not offered as a accident reconstructionist. 2. He was not hired to do a reconstruction. 3. He didn't need to write his own report. 4. He didn't need to test anything.

I would not now, not ever, recommend this supposed lawyer for anything then a trip to the state bar.

1. He was not offered as a accident reconstructionist.
2. He was not hired to do a reconstruction.
3. He didn't need to write his own report.
4. He didn't need to test anything.
Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

That's not even close to what the states witnesses has testified to. Or what the diagram actually shows. Or what the state says is seen in the data. Why lie about something like this? Not even Brennan agrees with you.

Nik Starow (@starowniklas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

No. This witness was specifically hired to evaluate the states experts reports. But he did do a kind of test. He tested the states ability to be honest. And the state failed.