
Peter Matejic
@statspeter
Chief Analyst, Insights and Analysis, at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation working to solve UK Poverty
ID: 1225379441158893568
06-02-2020 11:23:28
2,2K Tweet
2,2K Followers
1,1K Following

Dr Jay Watts That statement also relates to a 3 year timeframe. Many people won't be reassessed in that period, and therefore the new rules won't apply until later: questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questi⦠It's a misleading statistic.

Huge thanks to all the MPs who have signed the reasoned amendment. Any waverers should look out for new Joseph Rowntree Foundation analysis out later.


This is new Joseph Rowntree Foundation analysis showing that there aren't enough jobs for all the millions of people losing out from the cuts, so many will just see their living standards plummet.


Thanks BBC News (UK) for having me on (just after 12.20 at bbc.co.uk/iplayer/live/bβ¦.) I said I'm proud of everyone's work in getting mitigations for existing recipients, but it's not right that support is being cut from future members of a group we know to be at high risk of hardship.






I read this brilliant report from Emily Kenway in draft. Thanks to The Guardian for covering it. See jrf.org.uk/care/moving-in⦠for the full report.


This is terrible news and an awful decision. I have been so impressed by abrdn Financial Fairness Trust and everyone working there, with some really brilliant work produced. And beyond this, the way this seems to have been handled is just plain wrong.

Proud Joseph Rowntree Foundation is one of the signatories to this. Vote against the cuts!

Today MPs will vote on the amended welfare bill. MPs who choose to walk through the lobby and support this bill are paving the way for at least 150,000 people to be pulled into poverty. Here are just 3 reasons why they should oppose this bill from Katie Schmuecker π½

Actually around 50,000 people will be pulled into poverty by remaining cuts in Bill β this now our best estimate based on Govtβs impact assessments. Joseph Rowntree Foundation previously showed how DWP sleight of hand underplayed true poverty impact β same applies to this latest publication. π§΅1/3


