🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

We're getting ready to launch MetaROR and make peer review faster, more transparent and more efficient 💪 Join us and AIMOS for the official launch of MetaROR (MetaResearch Open Review), a new open platform for reviewing and sharing metaresearch operating with an innovative

💥New: "the media appear to be using preprints more selectively, perhaps because they have become more familiar with the risks" #Preprints #SciComm wp.me/p4m9em-dlM

I have spent 6 yrs studying preprints. In that time, the way we use and communicate about these studies has changed dramatically. Concerns about misinfo are real. But in addressing these concerns, we cannot lose sight of what makes preprints, preprints. #openscience

MetaROR has launched today! This free platform from Research on Research Institute (RoRI) and AIMOS, aims to change the way research is reviewed and shared. Using their Publish-Review-Curate model, MetaROR is making the publication process faster and more open. Details: researchonresearch.org/introducing-me…

"The peer review system no longer works to guarantee academic rigour - a different approach is needed" Professor Stephen Pinfield and colleagues from Boston and Leiden Universities discuss peer review and innovative platform MetaROR for The Conversation theconversation.com/the-peer-revie…

The peer review system is broken - a different approach is needed 💡 Kathryn Zeiler, Stephen Pinfield and Ludo Waltman write in The Conversation about how increased transparency in the review process could speed scientific progress: theconversation.com/the-peer-revie…

"I am delighted to see innovations in scholarly communication being led by metascientists themselves", says Brian Nosek (@[email protected]) Center for Open Science Scholarly communication faces big challenges: peer review pressure, limited access, & lack of openness. Metaresearch has a unique role in

🔓Our colleague André Brasil @andre-brasil.bsky.social presented a multi-perspective approach for more #diversity & #inclusion in research information analyses at the 2nd 2nd Global Summit on Diamond Open Access conference. Read about this multiversatory (Ismael ISM Rodrigo Costas Louise Bezuidenhout)👉osf.io/preprints/soca…

Accessibility, Archiving, and Open Metadata - A Copim Publishers’ Workshop · Copim ift.tt/E0niFBA

Great to be part of this new project and looking forward to working with a fantastic team led by Samuel Moore

I was asked to write an Op Ed piece by ResearchProfessionalNews on universities cancelling journal Big Deals: researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-vie… I was keen to stress that at least some of any savings must be used to support new, fairer models

Big news: our open review platform MetaROR is partnering with the STI-ENID 2025 Conference in Bristol MetaROR uses a publish-review-curate model. This means conference contributions like posters and papers will be shared openly, along with transparent reviews. Read more here:

We're advertising for a postdoctoral research associate to work on this exciting new project jobs.ac.uk/job/DMD201/res… Come and join the team exploring open research practices in the humanities and social sciences information-studies.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-mo…

Thanks david bawden & lyn robinson for the review doi.org/10.55741/knj.6… of my book Achieving Global Open Access doi.org/10.4324/978103… “recommended for anyone seeking an insightful analysis of the current problems of global open access, and thoughts...[on] future solutions”

New preprint, written with Narmin Rzayeva and Ludo Waltman investigating preprint adoption over time, and investigating disciplinary and regional differences.

Just published: "“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?" f1000research.com/articles/14-50…

OASPA's 'Next 50%' project: Your Voice Matters at a Critical Moment for Open Access - OASPA ift.tt/g7imxYF

“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era? ift.tt/OJvSMcL

Tracking transformative agreements through open metadata: method and validation using Dutch Research Council NWO funded papers ift.tt/qDjviQo

Judging research on its own merits: How MetaROR supports better research assessment | DORA ift.tt/yfVqITK