
Tara Leigh Grove
@taraleighgrove1
Professor @UTexasLaw. Federal Courts, Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, and Interpretive Theory.
ID: 1143697705228787712
26-06-2019 01:49:16
254 Tweet
3,3K Followers
927 Following

UTexasLaw is hosting a webinar on the Harvard/UNC #SCOTUS decision and its implications on 7/6 at 12:00 CST. Panelists include Tara Leigh Grove UTexasLaw, Fred Smith Emory Law and John Harrison UVA Law School! Please register here tiny.cc/JUL6-PANEL to attend!


The 2023 supplement for the Federal Courts casebook that I co-author with Tara Leigh Grove, John Jeffries, and Peter Low is now available! Covers decisions on standing, mootness, Section 1983, sovereign immunity, habeas corpus, and more, and is free for students using the book.


Thank you, Curtis Bradley!! We really hope the updated Teacher’s Manual will be useful to instructors. We both love teaching Fed Courts and are delighted to share that enthusiasm with others!!

Thrilled to share my piece, Is Textualism at War with Statutory Precedent? (forthcoming Texas Law Review). I offer a typology of statutory precedent and argue (contrary to many assumptions) that textualism is quite compatible with important uses of precedent. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Thanks so much, Lawrence Solum, for highly recommending (and adding “download it while it’s hot”) re: my piece, Is Textualism at War with Statutory Precedent? (forthcoming Texas Law Review), lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/20…

Wow -- thanks very much, Lawrence Solum, for selecting as the “Download of the Week,” my piece, Is Textualism at War with Statutory Precedent? (forthcoming Texas Law Review).

This 🧵by Richard M. Re is similar to, and similarly convincing to me as, a smart point Tara Leigh Grove made to Adam Liptak: nytimes.com/2023/12/29/us/…



Attention all Federal Courts instructors: We now have a new supplement for the Low & Jeffries’ Federal Courts casebook, covering all relevant decisions from this past Supreme Court term. It’s available here, free of charge to students using the casebook: 3668083.app.netsuite.com/core/media/med…


Thanks, Curtis Bradley!! We are delighted to provide the 2024 Supplement of the Low & Jeffries' Fed Courts casebook (for free!) to casebook users. 3668083.app.netsuite.com/core/media/med…



How do lower courts respond when the Supreme Court starts disfavoring (rather than overruling) its precedents—Bivens, for example, or Chevron before Loper Bright? How should they respond? Tara Leigh Grove and I explore these questions in this new paper. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Very excited to share a new paper (w/ Curtis Bradley) on how lower fed courts handle disfavored S Ct precedent. We offer case studies of Bivens and (pre-demise) Chevron and Lemon. It turns out that disfavored precedent can live on in the lower courts! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…


Thank you so much, Lawrence Solum, for highly recommending my paper (w/ Curtis Bradley) on how lower courts handle disfavored Supreme Court precedent!

Just posted on @ssrn: Private Injuries and Standing, by my colleague Ann Woolhandler papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… UVA Law School Cass Sunstein Andy Hessick William Baude Lise Beske

I’m pleased to report that my new paper with Tara Leigh Grove on disfavored Supreme Court precedent will be published by the Virginia Law Review. Our paper considers how lower courts do, and should, treat precedents that have fallen into disfavor on the Court but have not been

Thrilled to share Disfavored Supreme Court Precedent in the Lower Federal Courts (w/ Curtis Bradley) (forthc'g Virginia Law Review). How do and should lower courts respond when the SCt chips away at, w/out overruling, precedent? Case studies incl Bivens & Chevron (pre-Loper-Bright).
