🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Max Willsey Chandrakana Nandi Oliver Flatt Pavel Panchekha Zachary Tatlock Denis Merigoux Jonathan Protzenko Highlight 3: "Dynamic Race Detection with O(1) Samples" by Mosaad Al Thokair, Minjian Zhang, Umang Mathur, and Mahesh Viswanathan POPL'23

When Roger Penrose goes for a walk you might expect him to be thinking about cosmology etc. But he isn't. At least not always. Sometimes he is thinking about the walk itself. And the mathematics of it. Because Roger has his obsessions. Like lots of us.

One of my PhD students got their visa revoked. I know of other cases amongst my AI colleagues. This is not what investing in US leadership in AI looks like.

Aryeh Kontorovich Francesco Orabona I don't know anything about this topic Dr. Kontorovich but I got this with a few hours of coaxing.

I wrote a post on how to connect with people (i.e., make friends) at CS conferences. These events can be intimidating so here's some suggestions on how to navigate them I'm late for #ICLR2025 #NAACL2025, but just in time for #AISTATS2025 and timely for #ICML2025 acceptances! 1/4

Call for nominations for the Trevisan prize: cs.unibocconi.eu/call-nominatio…

"in 2025 we will have flying cars" 😂😂😂

I'm constantly irritated that I don't have time to read the torrent of cool papers coming faster and faster from amazing people in relevant fields. Other scientists have the same issue and have no time to read most of my lengthy conceptual papers either. So whom are we writing

What's the best sci-fi book ever written and why is it Solaris?

It’s hard to overstate the significance of this. It may end up looking like a “moon‑landing moment” for AI. Just to spell it out as clearly as possible: a next-word prediction machine (because that's really what it is here, no tools no nothing) just produced genuinely creative

Dear Reviewers, It is completely fine to admit you were wrong in your initial evaluations. You will not lose anything, and the authors, your AC, and your SAC will appreciate your intellectual honesty. Best, One of the SACs