🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Coolest OBBBA provision: temporary full expensing for some buildings. Normally, commercial buildings must be depreciated over 39 years—significantly raising the cost of capital. A temporary, limited reform isn’t perfect, but it lays the groundwork for broader progress.

The One Big Beautiful Bill: ✅ Is pro-growth ❌ Won’t pay for itself ✅ Includes permanent expensing & lower rates ❌ Adds complicated tax loopholes ✅ Repeals many green energy subsidies Cato Institute

Correct. more to do.

Objective analysis of the OBBB. Some exceptionally pro-growth components alongside the fiscally irresponsible and cronyist elements. But definitely cheering continuation of the TCJA’s individual income tax rate cuts and permanent expensing.

Welcome to Seattle. My politics are the opposite of whatever this is

Adam Michel Any honest group should acknowledge that the bill suffered from problems “here and there.” But you’ve got to respect Cato Institute’s passion in pointing out the bill also suffered from problems “here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.” 😆

On a scale from 1 to 10, I'd give the bill probably about a 5. Which isn't good, but it's better than most bills proposed in Congress.

This is insane.

An Orwellian autocrat would INCREASE spending, take control of PBS/NPR, and dictate his preferred nativist programming. Eliminating government funding for what would otherwise be privately funded entities is quite literally the opposite of that and reduces government influence.

There is virtually no empirical basis for this claim. Past presidents (D & R) signed presidentially-initiated rescissions with both unified and divided Congresses. Did bipartisanship cease to function in the 80s/90s? No. If anything, it worked better than it does today!