Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) 's Twitter Profile
Dan Kaminsky

@dakami

We can fix it. We have the technology. OK. We need to create the technology. Alright. The policy guys are mucking with the technology. Relax. WE'RE ON IT.

ID: 8917142

linkhttp://dankaminsky.com calendar_today16-09-2007 18:45:47

128,128K Tweet

85,85K Followers

417 Following

Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Addition does not break dependencies. Subtraction does. There is no constituency (usually) for the lack of a feature. There is always someone still using anything. No exception.

Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I wonder if it’s annoying to neuroscientists constantly having to preface google searches with ā€œNO NOT IN PYTORCH I’M TALKING ABOUT THE ACTUAL HUMAN BRAIN DAMNITā€

Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) 's Twitter Profile Photo

developer.nvidia.com/blog/exploring… ā€œThere are two ways to create CUDA graphs: construct the graph from scratch using graph APIs or use stream capture, which wraps a section of the application code and records the launched work from CUDA streams into a CUDA graph.ā€ Uh, USEFUL

Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) 's Twitter Profile Photo

hahahaha of course ktemkin, QEMU TCG is basically chaining together small bits of compiled code for the host CPU anyway, no reason you can’t just intentionally generate that finite set at compile time. CLEVER

Dan Kaminsky (@dakami) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Close. AI has plenty of doubt (most models can return probabilities for any prediction, if you configure them to). The problem is humans, not doubting the AI enough to notice when it doubts itself. It’s a tool, and it matters how you use it.