David Binder (@davidbinder) 's Twitter Profile
David Binder

@davidbinder

pollster, focus group moderator, not much else

ID: 20896634

calendar_today15-02-2009 06:19:29

555 Tweet

2,2K Followers

2,2K Following

Addisu Demissie (@asdem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Can’t stress this enough: in heavy vote by mail states (of which there will be more this fall), it is EXTREMELY TYPICAL for results to shift several points in the days/weeks after E Day. We (especially press) HAVE to normalize that therr might be a call in some states for a while

David Binder (@davidbinder) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Likely to have opposite impact — will stoke Dem base who are aghast that he willfully undermines confidence in the democratic process of free and fair elections

David Binder (@davidbinder) 's Twitter Profile Photo

question on errors in 2020 polling: was underrepresentation of those voting straight Republican ticket specific to Trump being on ballot and therefore less of a 2022 issue, or a permanent problem based in lack of trust of pollsters and all institutions? politico.com/news/2021/07/1…

Addisu Demissie (@asdem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Jon Favreau Nate Cohn Yup - a lot of factors played into increasing D turnout and I think if there is anything to learn from this election it will come from studying that. But it was definitely the strategy from Day One.

Addisu Demissie (@asdem) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ding ding ding one quibble and one caveat: quibble: it’s doesn’t just energize Dem voters, it’s actually the rare message that both motivates and persuades. caveat: november 2022 is very. far. away.

David Binder (@davidbinder) 's Twitter Profile Photo

CA recall results was about winning independents as well as motivating Dems. Our polling showed vaccinated independents voting 33 yes, 67 no. Unvaccinated independents were 90 yes, 10 no. but the vast majority of independents who voted in CA recall were vaccinated.

David Binder (@davidbinder) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This may be the right take, but important to hold off on "polls were wrong" stories until after all the CA ballots are counted.

Greg Sargent (@gregtsargent) 's Twitter Profile Photo

David Roberts Dan Ancona 💰⚔️ David Binder My objective here was not to say, "I'm certain these focus groups are perfect reflections of what people think." It was to use these results to raise Qs about whether a more forward looking approach, one focused on the threat to *future* elections, is needed

Nat Mund (@nmund1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Addisu Demissie Absolutely true. But the results demonstrate that the number of voters that might be open to such an argument is much larger than (at least I) thought. Lots of work remains, but there is reason to be hopeful.

Matt Glassman (@mattglassman312) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A reminder that there’s no horserace aspect to counting votes. No one “pulls ahead” in the count or “makes up ground” or “loses their lead” in any real sense. It’s just an artifact of the process, the order in which votes are counted, an order part mandated and part random.

Matt Glassman (@mattglassman312) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You can’t win or lose in the count. It’s not a football game with an outcome yet to be determined. It’s the slow unwrapping of a present, the awaiting of knowing the actual and unchangeable state of the world.

David Binder (@davidbinder) 's Twitter Profile Photo

About one million additional ballots counted in California since wednesday AM; the new 1mm are about 2 points more Democrat than election night returns; Prop 1 also two points higher in the new million.

Max Kanin 🇺🇦 (@mdkanin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

KTLA I need to explain why this poll is bullshit. California does not have a Democratic gubernatorial primary. We have a primary where all candidates run on the same ballot, every voter gets a single vote, and whichever top two candidates get the most votes, advance regardless of