🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Obviously US voters oppose the AI regulation moratorium. Every poll in every country that has asked about AI regulation favors more regulation, not less. The public is (rightly) net worried about AI & its impacts, and wants it regulated.

Insane how much money tech companies (Meta specifically) are willing to spend to get this regulatory moratorium through:

If someone tells you that training gen AI on copyrighted work without a license is legal in the US, send them Judge Chhabria’s ruling from yesterday: “In many circumstances it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission.”

This fantastic piece tells the stories of the tech workers who are losing their jobs to AI. Please read it. AI is a tool, yes. A tool to replace people. But there is hope in the final story in the piece. Execs may celebrate AI as a labor replacement - but workers will protest.

The provision in the Republican budget that bans states from regulating AI is really extraordinary and deserves way more attention. It's just a gift to the AI industry so that they can speed forward with job killing AI with zero checks and zero protections for workers.

Andrew Ng advertises & celebrates one judge's ruling that training LLMs on copyrighted books is fair use, but fails to mention that another judge said the opposite the very next day: that in many cases doing so will be illegal. He says he is "very sympathetic with the many

Suno will pay for other tech companies, but it won't pay for the music its models are built on. These priorities seem backwards to me.

Sam Altman this you?

really good founder-led comms clip. if you're in the SF tech bubble, watch ~30sec to calibrate your view on how others still view AI

This shows (i) the huge strength of anti-AI feeling and (ii) that large groups of people protesting against AI can make a difference. Also very well-handled by MrBeast. AI folks should expect more backlash like this I think

AI execs out in force this week highlighting Monday's ruling saying book training is fair use, yet somehow failing to mention Tuesday's ruling that said Monday's used an "inapt analogy" and in fact unlicensed training will often not be fair use 🤔

🚨🚨Today we begin the search for ARIA's next CEO It's not often you get to hire for a role that you believe is not only someone's dream job, but genuinely one of the highest impact opportunities in the world... but this is it.. 🧵🧵

For decades, Congress has proven incapable of passing legislation to govern the virtual space. To protect vulnerable individuals from being exploited by Big Tech, I’ve led the fight to pass bills like the Kids Online Safety Act and the Open App Markets Act. Blocking states from

📢 Sen. Marsha Blackburn: "Blocking states from regulating AI without a national standard in place would hand another victory to greedy Big Tech companies who put profits over people." 👏

At the end of this panel on AI in San Francisco, we were asked for one sentence, the single message we hoped people would take away. Mine was just two words:

Powerful open letter today from a group of authors to their publishers, asking those publishers to reject the replacement technology of AI. "Every time a prompt is entered into AI, the language that bot uses to respond was created in part through the synthesis of art that we,

🚨 REPUBLICAN GOVS OPPOSE AI MORATORIUM: Governors from AL, AK, GA, ID, IA, LA, MO, MT, NE, ND OK, SC, SD, TN, UT, WY sent a joint letter to Leader John Thune and Speaker Mike Johnson to remove the Big Tech handout from the reconciliation package.

They get it.