Garand Tyson (@gttyson) 's Twitter Profile
Garand Tyson

@gttyson

I like computers

ID: 1634691801838944256

calendar_today11-03-2023 23:04:43

33 Tweet

359 Followers

20 Following

Garand Tyson (@gttyson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Said it before and I'll say it again, PoS isn't decentralized long term. 1. You never know who controls the network, stake addresses are anonymous, most stake could be controlled by one entity and you'll never know. (fun fact, 65% of @Solana stake is in Switzerland rn) 2. Small

Garand Tyson (@gttyson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The premise is correct, institutions that want any involvement in concensus need to stake ETH. I find the conclusion that institutions are willing to hold $100s of millions to billions of volatile crypto assets when better alternatives exist highly suspect.

Tomer Weller (@tomerweller) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Justin Bons Categorically wrong on all fronts wrt Stellar. - The Stellar Consensus Protcol (SCP) is an open participation protocol and in practice the nakamoto coefficient is similar to many PoS chains (and increasing). - WASM/Rust turing complete smart contracts (launched last year) -

Garand Tyson (@gttyson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I see stuff like this a lot, folks have a deep misunderstanding of how PoS works. Validator count literally does not matter, concencus uses stake percentage, not individual validator votes. On Solana, 41 validators control the entire network. Mathematically, it does not matter