🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

We churn out more & more papers *per scientist*, at an increasing pace, in a rapidly changing publication landscape. Why? How? Want to make sense of this? In a new paper just published in Quantitative Science Studies we dive in & look for answers. direct.mit.edu/qss/article/do…

Are student evaluations biased against women? Most papers in this space answer a definitive and resounding "yes." However, this new working paper by Andersson et al. (2024) argues that we should pump the breaks on this conclusion, even if perhaps only a little. Andersson et

We have an updated version of our paper: 'Gender Diversity and Diversity of Ideas'. Adding one more year of data on the Econ job market: Women in Male Fields still much more likely to be placed as AP than anyone else... drive.google.com/file/d/1wBY1eP…

🚨 Only one month left to submit your proposal! 🚨 Join us for the SMS 45th Annual Conference, happening October 11–14, 2025, in San Francisco. Don’t forget—proposals for conference extensions are also due by February 19, 2025! hubs.li/Q032Rh6H0

Now published, Review of Financial Studies, "War Discourse and Disaster Premium: 160 Years of Evidence from the Stock Market" academic.oup.com/rfs/article-ab… #SocialFinance #machinelearning #stockmarket

The ban we'd all prefer.

Even when women network as much as men, spend as much time with senior leadership as men, and score the same on performance reviews as men, they didn't advance as quickly. s.hbr.org/35Qo2q3

Bei der Kombi St. Gallen und Tumulte in der Vorlesung hätte man hellhörig werden müssen. Naja

How to be a better critical thinker: 1. Be 10% more skeptical of people you agree with—and 10% more charitable to people you disagree with 2. Look for flaws in ideas you like—and strengths in arguments you dislike 3. Learn from sources that engage with competing ideas

Remember this study about how LLM generated research ideas were rated to be more novel than expert-written ones? We find a large fraction of such LLM generated proposals (≥ 24%) to be skillfully plagiarized, bypassing inbuilt plagiarism checks and unsuspecting experts. A 🧵

Contestants on MasterChef who are exposed to ANGER 🤬 from judges - end up higher in the final rankings, - increase their probability of success in cooking challenges, - increase their probability of reaching the top three and even winning the competition.

Today is the eighth anniversary of the 'BBC Dad' blooper, so here are some recent family pictures. The kids are growing fast. 1 youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4f9A…

If everyone has impostor syndrome, does it exist at all? Or are we simply experiencing a kind of humility inflation? nyer.cm/EsMVekv

🚨in our new paper we ran an experiment at Procter and Gamble with 776 experienced professionals solving real business problems. We found that individuals randomly assiged to use AI did as well as teams of two people and were happier as well. Lots more in the link in the reply!

Happy to share that my paper, "The Political Transformation of Corporate America, 2001-2022," has been conditionally accepted at the American Political Science Review (American Political Science Review)! Updated draft here: bit.ly/3DU4Vj7

Like the paper below? Here's another that will be right up your alley. In this paper, the authors merge voter file data and online resumes to create a panel of 34.5 (!) million people. They show that Democrats and Republicans choose distinctive career paths and employers. This

Our paper on ingroup bias in the Indian judiciary — we didn't find any — is finally out! This paper has one of the two best graphs I've ever made — on publication bias in the judicial bias literature. Black circles are prior studies on ingroup bias. Explanation in 🧵👇🏻

“America would be better off if more people worked in manufacturing.” • 80% of Americans agree • 20% disagree “I would be better off if I worked in a factory.” • 25% of Americans agree • 73% disagree • 2% currently work in a factory 👉🏻 cato.org/sites/cato.org…

K L A S S E N E R H A L T 🤩🤩🤩 #FCUVfB

"We thank the reviewers for their suggestions and believe they have substantially improved the paper."