isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile
isi

@i_geshi

Everything that can be burned by the truth, should have a “flammable” label.

ID: 1442802399035510787

calendar_today28-09-2021 10:44:49

74 Tweet

29 Followers

234 Following

isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I like the generalization here - but it obfuscates smth. Generally, we try to find solutions to a formalism under constraints e.g. locality. Smth constitutes a "Problem" if it requires novel or hard-to-interpret constraints. This distinguishes QM from the other examples.

isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What would a society look like where your ability to enter any form of legally binding contract is conditioned on you upholding past ones as well as oaths?

isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Proving that a concept is ill defined or has fuzzy boundaries is not tantamount to proving its non-existence from a pragmatic lens.

isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

And man said, ‘Let there be God’; and there was God. But man shall answer, ‘No, not like that; that is not what I meant.’ and behold, it will be too late —for the universe was reproducible, but no one saved the seed.

isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We had a brief moment in history where deferral by trust could be suspended by high quality content accessible to anyone everywhere all at once. Prepare to return to navigating the world of content mostly via trust networks once more.

isi (@i_geshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I think beautifully put and points at something real. But i am more optimistic. A subtle omission makes this work. Being seen =\= connection. You must also be able to see (= be sufficiently similar). A relationship is not a panopticon. At the same time, maybe that’s next.