Steffi Burchardt
@inthevolcano
mother, volcano researcher, structural geologist, field fox, modeller, traveller, teacher
ID: 1957039862
http://steffiburchardt.com 12-10-2013 16:43:12
731 Tweet
800 Followers
86 Following
Steffi Burchardt The time spent varies quite a lot, from a few hours to a day or so. If the paper is very much within my experience/expertise, then it often doesn't take me long. As with most things, I think you get better (and quicker) at assessing work/reviewing papers the more of it you do 1/n
Steffi Burchardt The key piece of advice is, if you’ve published before, to review as you would want to be reviewed: be constructive, be helpful. I don’t necessarily think there’s a need to be “nice”, I think it’s OK to get to the point, but there’s definitely no room for being “nasty” 2/n
Steffi Burchardt I think it’s a good idea for those new to reviewing to read the paper once through first, before making any comments. Then mark up the manuscript on the second read. Use these comments to formulate a set of “main comments” 3/n
Steffi Burchardt These could be issues you may have with the way things are measured, potential problems with the analysis or modelling, or important aspects that you consider missing. These should be comments that you consider important for the paper to be eventually published 4/n
Steffi Burchardt Remembering that, as a reviewer, your main job is to make sure the science is sound and to not try to have the authors write the paper you would have written. Any remaining comments, “minor comments”, can then be appended below 5/n
Steffi Burchardt These could be flagging typos, asking for small clarifications, etc. Then you decide, based on the severity of your main comments, on your recommendation to the editor: reject, reject resubmit, major, minor, or accept as is 6/n
Steffi Burchardt One strategy I often use is to give authors the benefit of the doubt and the chance to reply: maybe the “big mistake” you think they made in their calculations is an assumption that they just forgot to explain? 7/n
Steffi Burchardt Give it some thought, as there’s someone on the end of your decision, but it's also important be fair to help the editor make the best possible decision 8/8
What an amazing talk by @hollyeunwin Hugh Tuffen and Dr Fabian Wadsworth on Mule Creek! Just wow! #vVMSG2022
Paper, led by Ben Kennedy, just accepted in Volcanica! The paper, about the thermal impact of dykes on regional fluid-flow, focuses on a fantastic field location in the East Fjords of Iceland. Just look at that! 🌋😍 More soon! Steffi Burchardt MCV Rock Mechanics Hugh Tuffen Élodie Saubin
okay, i need to know: who is planning to attend #EGU22 in person? European Geosciences Union
Our perspectives paper on the development of volcanic plumbing systems studies is out. We look at what has happened in the last 20 years and make some educated guesses about the future rdcu.be/cNRyx @surayahazim Prof Janine Kavanagh and Catherine Annen
She nailed it! CNDS Fellow, Emma Rhodes (Emma Rhodes) nailing the PhD thesis. The public defence will be on the 9th of June. More info on our website: cnds.se #volcano #volcanology #magma
Different room, another extremely relevant topic - magma chambers and volcano deformation, presentation by Steffi Burchardt (Steffi Burchardt) in EGU GMPV Division #egu22.
One more online presentation by Taylor Witcher (Taylor Witcher) on "Enrichment of immobile elements in synmagmatic fractures" in EGU GMPV Division at #egu22.
Full room for Steffi Burchardt's (Steffi Burchardt) presentation today on #geothermal potential of #volcanicintrusions during EGU GMPV Division session. #volcanology #iceland #geothermic #caldera
From now on, Dr. Emma Rhodes (Emma Rhodes), together with her main supervisor, Steffi Burchardt. Congrats, Emma!
Our most recent Doctor's research portrait is out now. Read and learn more about Emma Rhodes (Emma Rhodes). Other research portraits can be found on our website: cnds.se/research/resea… Thank you, Emma for taking the time to answer to our questions.
