🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

For those that don't already know, some news. law.wm.edu/news/stories/2…

My quick views on yesterday's oral argument: Sauer's amazing embrace of judicial supremacy. But can the Court trust him? open.substack.com/pub/executivef…

And Bauer and I discuss the details of the oral argument and my post as well. open.substack.com/pub/executivef…

Sounds like WH doesn't think the argument went so well. Or maybe it did not like SG Sauer's pledge, over and over, to “respect the opinions and the judgments of the Supreme Court.” See my analysis: executivefunctions.substack.com/p/the-solicito…

Thank you Orin!

Interesting and IMO fair assessment, mainly, but not only, about "the politics of higher education in Trump II" as revealed in the McMahon letter. compactmag.com/article/does-t…

The proposition that the Court does not have rightful authority to enjoin a particular action by the Trump administration does not imply that the Trump action is lawful. So, for example, it is entirely coherent to agree with the Alito/CT dissent last Friday on Venezuelan

Read today's Executive Functions Roundup, featuring two Alien Enemies Act rulings, two announcements from the DOJ, and commentary from Nicholas Bednar and Erwin Chemerinsky. executivefunctions.substack.com/p/executive-fu…

Elucidating analysis of the issues and stakes in Trump v. CASA by Adam White. thedispatch.com/article/nation…

Read today's Executive Functions Roundup, featuring developments in the evolving South Sudan deportations case, an Alien Enemies Act ruling, and more. executivefunctions.substack.com/p/executive-fu…

Bob Bauer and I discuss Trump v. Wilcox, the Supreme Court’s important emergency docket ruling on Presidential removal power, including what it means for Humphrey’s Executor, and other potential short- and long-term consequences. open.substack.com/pub/executivef…

No. This is one of the most blatantly unlawful acts by the Administration. But since no one has sued (and perhaps no one can sue), very few are paying attention, and the administration has offered no legal defense.

.Adrian Vermeule on the NEMA decision: "on the best current evidence, there will likely be no Loper Bright 'revolution.'” (Which he predicted in Law's Abnegation- in 2016: "the long-term trend of judicial deference to agency legal interpretations . . . predates Chevron by many

This is an accurate description of trends I see among conservative students at a number of top law schools.

Jack Goldsmith My take on this from yesterday.