Quick, to the Fact-Check-Mobile!

This person once took money to eat dog food live on her show...so consider the source. the-independent.com/news/world/ame…

Maybe you sit out negligence with electronic communications...

New bit of Gaffnese I haven't heard before from Harvey Peeler: Podium Wrasslin'.

It is BAT SHIT CRAZY that the telecom industry has successfully fought this for 20 years now. The ban on this tech literally kills people.

Huh. It's almost as if you compare Mitt Romney to a plantation owner, people stop believing you after a while.

Lol wut? This isn't a speech and debate clause in the SC Constitution. Why would you print Loftis' nonsense verbatim? This is easily fact-checked.

This is what happens when we tell reporters, "Learn to code."

"After Saying Something, the Opposite is True," isn't the newsiest of Loftis headlines.

Shut it down. Wes won Twitter today. 🤣

We need the protection of Saint Milton Friedman now more then ever in these protectionist times.

I'm sure Nancy Mace will tweet very soon that this is protected by the speech and debate clause 🙄

You just lost white women.

This is not an unimportant point. Tariffs are bad, but uncertainty is worse. Are these here to stay? If so, for how long? Or is it a negotiating position? Large employers can weather tariffs....weathering uncertainty is much more difficult.

Say, let's give a hostile foreign government unlimited access to social video algorithms tied to personal identifying information, because they definitely won't use it to make really good propaganda videos.

Irresponsible click bait bullshit.

🤞🙏🍀💪‼️

Tariffs only "work" when they're not being collected. Advocates claim tariffs force people to "buy American," leading to a theoretical resurgence in American manufacturing and re-shoring. Because people aren't buying imported goods, few tariffs are collected. OR consumers say

It's fine, they're brand new jet engines powered by pure sanctimony.