🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Things that will get you a love letter from Gary Gensler, accusing you of selling securities: ✅ providing IT services ✅ hiring a lawyer ✅ getting a smart contract audited

Spinach on the bottom of a sub, not the top…will die on this hill

How can #blockchain can stop counterfeits? 🛑 Can AI be an author? 🤔 Our upcoming podcast episode dives into this and more with Nehan Sethi and Jordan Teague. Stay tuned for tomorrow's release. 😉 Nehan Sethi jordan

I think I’ve spotted something fishy in the market, Gary Gensler.

This doesn't necessarily mean the SEC is targeting VCs; it could mean the SEC is gathering information from VCs about projects that it wants to target

TLDR: don’t contradict your smart contract with your legalese. This happens too often in the governance context, where human-readable gov docs conflict with a voting smart contract. Example: DAO gov docs require a quorum, but smart contract has no way to enforce that. Not good

Excited to be speaking at FordhamLawCrypto today with Erich Dylus jordan Alex Golubitsky CryptoTaxGuy I remain a techno-optimist despite years of hostility and skepticism from regulators. Today’s topic — Building for a Bright Future from the Dark Forest

proud to see South Carolina (and the Southeast in general) on the list of states calling GG to task for regulatory overreach ag.ky.gov/Press%20Releas…

This is what you get when you blend "facts and circumstances" common law principles with novel technologies that judges don't understand Is "Lido DAO" a partnership? Not necessarily...but now they (whoever "they" are) get to spend millions in legal fees to prove otherwise

when many people say "DAO wrapper," what they really mean is liability sponge: an entity designed to attract attention to itself, and away from tokenholders such entities may have their benefits, but they will not literally wrap tokenholders in a blanket of liability protection

The most important issue currently facing the digital asset industry is the DOJ’s interpretation of Section 1960 - the criminal code provision punishing unlicensed “money transmitting businesses.” That is why I wrote this paper with Jake Chervinsky and Daniel Barabander explaining the

TC removed from sanctions list Corporate Transparency Act enjoined the good guys are winning

a dead giveaway that a legal doc is just AI copypasta: no auto-numbering of paragraphs

lawyering is: - 10% about having good ideas - 90% about being able to communicate those ideas effectively

Do you want to live in a world where a few tech oligarchs control our data, communication and commerce? There is another possible world...but it requires creating regulatory space for decentralized alternatives to thrive. The DRC proposes how to make this happen.

This could end up being crypto apocalypse. However, if Ripple wins the bidding war, that doesn't mean game over--there will be an antitrust review and Ripple has a long history of using any power it has to FUD other blockchains. Making Ripple the largest asset issuer on every

tbh "I got the fake cases from my client" is worse than "I got the fake cases from AI"

copyleft feels more ethos-aligned than BSL, but the effect can be similar because these licenses cause compatibility issues. if a project doesn't need other devs to integrate their code but it wants to protect against unfair competition, copyleft may make sense

which would you rather do in 2025:

TIL no one has done a captcha recently