🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

General relativity is not a spin-2 field theory. There is no gravitational field in general relativity, but do not tell that to string theorists, so they can keep trying to quantize it for another 50 years. They have to make a living, right?

Nuclear physicists transform elements since 1919. The easiest way to make gold is neutron irradiation of mercury. Much cheaper than what CERN does. Even so, the only gain is some press.

Quantum field theorists: our theory is the most complete and accurately tested in history. Also quantum field theorists: the "vacuum" of the quantum field is filled with an infinite collection of particles.

No one should be surprised if my critical review of "Waves in an Impossible Sea" runs to over 300 pages.

I have finished the first draft of my review of Waves in an Impossible Sea. Over 320 pages. I am now preparing figures. Contrary to myth, the particles we observe in experiments are not quanta of fields. Also general relativity does not describe gravity as a gravitational field.

Newtonian gravity is not a limiting case of general relativity. Newtonian gravity is an action-at-a-distance theory. The second is a metric theory. General Relativity does not reduce to Newtonian gravity when c —> ∞.

Quantum mechanics is not a limiting case of quantum field theory. They are "disjoint theories" as Dirac said once. Quantum field theory does not reduce to quantum mechanics when c —> ∞.

Classical mechanics is not a limiting case of quantum mechanics. This is why the founding fathers of quantum mechanics introduced a dual structure. Quantum mechanics does not reduce to classical mechanics when h —> 0.

Fun fact: photons do not exist, as Feynman suspected. Lesson: never take lessons from academic imbeciles

A recent study in Journal of Chemical Education showed that nearly two thirds 68% of introductory science texts incorrectly equate "isotope" and "nuclide".