Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile
Michael Yaffe

@mbyaffe

Professor at MIT, Surgeon-Scientist. DNA damage signaling, protein kinases, precision cancer medicine, signaling in tumor microenvironment

ID: 75444247

calendar_today19-09-2009 01:54:57

137 Tweet

898 Followers

121 Following

CPRatUCPH (@ucph_cpr) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Despite our scientific success Novo Nordisk Foundation will close CPR due to new funding strategy. #forskpol #DKforsk We applaud our visionary leader Jiri Lukas for creating a global flagship in protein research whose pioneering spirit will live on #CPRlegacy. How did he do this? 👇🧵

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Congrats to Justine Stehn, Scott Floyd, and Yi Kong on what I hope will be the first of a series of papers showing alterations in protein translational control after DNA damage through stress signaling and 14-3-3. frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

RNA Damage? Happy to share Jung-Kuei Chen and Karl Merrick and YaffeLab preprint that reports the major mechanism of 5-FU action in clinically relevant cancer treatment is through damage to structured RNAs...biorxiv.org/content/10.110….

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In the bioRxiv paper, we find that 5-FU shows no synergy at the cellular level with the DNA damaging drugs oxaliplatin or irinotecan - the combination given for GI cancer Rx. Instead, ribosome and tRNA biogenesis is impaired, driving an apoptotic signal that does not require p53

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Very grateful to our collaborators at Genentech, Adam Palmer's lab, Adam C Palmer, Matt Vander Heiden's lab, MVH Lab, and Omer Yilmaz's lab Omer Yilmaz, and of course the Koch Institute! Koch Institute at MIT

Albertas Navickas (@a_navickas) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Links between translation and alternative polyadenylation in metastasis? The story is out today! A great collab between Hani Goodarzi, Andrei Goga and Faraz K Mardakheh labs! Shout out to co-authors Hossein Asgharian, Juliane Winkler, @lisacfishsci among others! nature.com/articles/s4155…

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thrilled to share our characterization of the human tyrosine kinome. Try out the public website: kinase-library.mit.edu/home Wonderful collaboration with Cantley Lab Turk Lab YaffeLab. Many years of work led by Jared Johnson! nature.com/articles/s4158…

Michael Eisen (@mbeisen) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is rich - one of the primary reasons scientists don't have a lot of time to think is that @nature and its ilk have promoted a culture where the primary goal of science is to produce bloated Nature papers that require lots of time and money, but little thought, to produce.

This is rich - one of the primary reasons scientists don't have a lot of time to think is that @nature and its ilk have promoted a culture where the primary goal of science is to produce bloated Nature papers that require lots of time and money, but little thought, to produce.
Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

nature.com/articles/s4158… Thrilled to share this latest work led by Xiao-Kang Lun in Peng Yin's lab and Xueyang Yu in mine. Finally, single cell signaling can begin to rival single cell RNA-Seq, using CyTOF, phospho-antibodies and ACE amplification.

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thrilled to share our latest story on 5-FU inducing RNA damage during ribosome biogenesis - cell.com/cell-reports-m…. The whole thing started when Karl and Jung-Kuei were trying to figure out hiow limiting dNTPS skewed DNA repair. Never thought it would be RNA and tge ribosome!

Michael Yaffe (@mbyaffe) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Special thanks to Adam Palmer's lab, Matt Vander Heiden's lab, Omer Yilmaz's lab, and the folks at Genentech, all of whom were instrumental in this 5-FU story about RNA damage! Collaborative science is always the best!

Michael Eisen (@mbeisen) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Scientists and universities: defend indirects as a concept but not current indirect rates. Don't think there's waste in those numbers? We (US science) spend $4.5 billion on journals. That is HALF of the proposed cuts in indirects, and eliminating that spending would make science