
Nicholas Bagley
@nicholas_bagley
Professor at @UMichLaw, former Chief Legal Counsel to @GovWhitmer
ID: 2191120380
https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=nbagley 12-11-2013 22:02:24
29,29K Tweet
26,26K Followers
631 Following





New report by me and Anatoly Ivanov: The Procedural Hangover: How NEPA Litigation Obstructs Critical Projects NEPA litigation reshapes the process. Agencies pad the record, reports get longer, timelines slip, and projects are not built. Hence, the procedural hangover.

Itās hard to find a trend in the electricity system right now that *doesnāt* point to near-term price increases if not a broad affordability crisis. The setup is bad and getting worse. I wrote about it for Heatmap News:


This work benefitted radically from input from our review board Nicholas Bagley Jennifer Hernandez David Schleicher Arnab Datta James Coleman Chris Elmendorf. Shoutout to Nick in particular for his work on the "procedure fetish" that inspired our title.



Just discovered this David Roberts series on creating great cities, which anticipates so much of the piece that David Schleicher & I wrote for Niskanen Center. Check it out: grist.org/article/2011-0ā¦

Three makes a trend: Wildtype approved to sell cultivated salmon, Mission Barns approved to sell cultivated pork fat, now believermeats has FDA green light to sell cultivated chicken. I didnāt expect RFK Jr. to let this happen and Iām glad I was wrong.

Is decarbonization dead? Jane Flegal & I join Ezra Klein to talk through how Trump just shredded America's most ambitious climate policy, what survived, and where we go from here. Listen The New York Times or wherever you get your podcasts. š link below.


Everything David Broockman Josh Kalla is a must read. But this one particularly. Has huge implications for local elections too -- which are usually either formally non-partisan or where most action happens in primaries.





Good š§µ on limits of what one can learn from "win rates" in corpus of reported NEPA cases. ā¤µļø FWIW, I think/hope the main payoff from Breakthrough's effort to compile NEPA cases will be facilitating future studies of what judges *say*. Study the texts, not the outcomes.